Talk:War of the Roses (video game)

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (7 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (3 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Reception - undid comment

I undid the revision by Ottawakismet that added this unreferenced line to the Reception section ‘War of the Roses is a departure from the typical style of games for Paradox Interactive, most of their games involve empire management.’ As it seems to be a personal opinion and as such adds no information to the reception section.

AeronwenTrewent (talk) 01:31, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dates - format change

On Feb 28th Izno changed about 20 dates from European format to American format (there were about 3 in the American format). The article is about a Swedish made game and therefore national ties are to European format.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:MOSNUM says 'If an article has evolved using predominantly one format, the whole article should conform to it, unless there are reasons for changing it based on strong national ties to the topic or consensus on article talk.'

The fact that the article used predominantly European format and was talking about a European game should be respected and the dates should be reverted to European format.

AeronwenTrewent (talk) 01:33, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As no-one has commented on this I reverted the dates to the original European format. AeronwenTrewent (talk) 12:20, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Development - quotes removed

On Feb 28th Izno removed properly referenced quotes which had been used to explain the content of the free dlc’s. Without the quotes all the dlc release notifications say the same thing and are not informative.

I think these changes should be reversed, however in the same edit there are some other minor changes which should probably be retained.

AeronwenTrewent (talk) 01:35, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Since no-one has commented on this I returned some of the quotes to the page to explain the contents of each DLC. AeronwenTrewent (talk) 13:14, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Development - undid microtransactions and relaunch

On 1 April 2013 70.26.134.116 made 2 odd alterations to the development text.

A note of the option to purchase in game currency was made under 15 October 2013 when it was announced. The comment added to the 8 March 2013 was misleading as it implies that microtransactions are for DLC rather than in game gold.

The change to 21 March comment is more justified as Kingmaker was a relaunch. However the original text here was taken from the Paradox announcement, so I reverted to the original text and added ‘relaunch’. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AeronwenTrewent (talk • contribs) 23:14, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]