Talk:Wakefield Mystery Plays

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Wakefield Mystery Plays is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Theatre Mid‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat#American and Young Vic performances|Bible One: Two Looks at the Book of Genesis]] The anchor (#American and Young Vic performances) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Men and Mystery Plays

I think whoever speculated about the population of Wakefield is a bit wrongheaded. They write "assuming half are male", yet there is considerable evidence these days that suggests women did have acting roles. People seem to read Shakespeare and assume that some kind of social progress lead to women playing women in present days, as though Shakespeare couldn't have been a social dip. 96.55.112.12 (talk) 21:59, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Proposal

I propose that the article on the Wakefield master be merged into the authorship section because no discussion of the cycle isn't complete without one about the Master, while the article about the Wakefield Master might not be able to stand alone very well.--Cassmus 06:50, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Suits me! I'm sort of new to Wikipedia, so I'm not entirely sure how to go about it, but as the author of the first version of this article, I think your suggestion is sensible so long as "Wakefield Master" refers back to that page. --Otterswimshome 19:36, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad you agree. Let's leave the merge tag up for a few weeks, just in case anybody else who's interested wants to comment or leave an opinion.--Cassmus 07:00, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm proposing another merge here. This time I suggest that we merge the Wakefield Stanza article into this one because only that article links to this one, and a discussion about the stanza is not complete without an understanding of the cycle (just like the former article about the Wakefield Master).--Cassmus 22:11, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Suits me, again! --Otterswimshome 05:38, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Title change?

We have pages here for York Mystery Plays, Chester Mystery Plays, Coventry Mystery Plays and Wakefield Cycle. In the interests of consistency wouldn't it be better to call this one Wakefield Mystery Plays? That might also serve clarity, since it makes the subject a little more obvious. Alternatively, some might prefer Towneley Mystery Plays since it leaves the question of the Wakefield location open. --Antiquary (talk) 19:25, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No objections, so far. I'll be bold and change it to Wakefield Mystery Plays. --Antiquary (talk) 19:34, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Wakefield Mystery Plays/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.

Requires infobox
Requires photographs
Requires addition of inline references using one of the {{Cite}} templates
Requires copy edit for WP:MOS

Keith D (talk) 21:03, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 21:03, 26 July 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 10:09, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Mobile screens

The two presentations of the stanza, with 4 long lines or 8 short ones, display almost identically on the screen of my smartphone, which is too narrow to display the long lines at full length; the resulting soft breaks happen to correspond almost exactly with the hard line breaks in the short-line version. I have fixed this by replacing blockquote tags and colons with {{poem}} templates.

--Thnidu (talk) 23:53, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]