Talk:Urban Reign

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Gilman Louie (1 participant)
Yoshimitsu (1 participant)
Dr. Wily (2 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (2 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (4 participants)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (6 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (7 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

About the major character section. I don't think it's a good idea to just copy and paste the text from the Urban Reign website about the background for each character.

MoonSoo: I actually didn't copy everything from the site verbatim. I tried mixing up a few words. That and the fact that I usually just edit this page while at school, so I don't have access to the biographies in the game.

–I don't understand why this is a Start class article. I don't see how much else could go in.--littlemute 17:32, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why should we have a main characters section? Many other characters aren't mentioned at all! Why can't we at least mention all of the characters or divide the character section.

Gameplay section

The article doesn't summarize the gameplay while maintaining the neutrality that would be expected. No opposing views of any of the game's flaws, which includes grievances of consumers and critics alike, have been accounted for, either. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Reycount (talk • contribs) 20:06, 4 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

So...you write a paragraph about it? Why not just rewrite the gameplay section instead? One thing to note is that VERY few, if any, reviews mention the Kill Bill factor as it's a notable homage to the films with the final boss. Want to know why? None of them finished the game. The biggest issue you read about is that it's a difficult game, which noted in the description.--littlemute 01:54, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Got a point. It should not, and I repeat NOT, be biased, so I just cut most of the critism which are more opinions rather than facts.