Talk:Tyranitar

Tyranitar was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 27, 2007	Good article nominee	Not listed
June 6, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed

Current status: Delisted good article

Pokémon

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Pokémon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Pokémon universe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PokémonWikipedia:WikiProject PokémonTemplate:WikiProject PokémonPokémon articles

Video games: Nintendo

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

This redirect is supported by the Nintendo task force.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (6 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (2 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

fact check

please fact check [1]

I would Learn Tyranitar the Surf

Tyraniboah

Tyraniboah is mentioned in various other articles as countering Skarm Bliss, but there's no mention here.

simple, wikipedia is not a game guide, so no mention here, Sir de wario 18:26, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA fail

This failed its GA nom because one (or more) images do not contain detailed fair use rationales, which is required by the GA criteria. G1 gg y ! 04:31, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Which images? All three fair use images had rationales long before 27 May 2007. The fourth image is from commons. Gimmetrow 05:14, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eek...copy pasted from another one. That should be a reference to the cleanup tag on it (also in the GA criteria). Sorry for the confusion. G1 gg y ! _{Review me!} 21:41, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The version you reviewed had no cleanup tags. Gimmetrow 21:59, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to re-review it now. Has it been re-nominated? (I will regardless, just so I know if I need to remove it from the list again) G1 gg y ! _{Review me!} 22:11, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, done. Passed. G1 gg y ! _{Review me!} 22:35, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary

loads of unnecessary info in the Video Game section. It needs to be cleaned up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.170.11.100 (talk • contribs)

That's what clean up tags are for. That's why I added one. Thanks for bringing that to our attention. I'm not blaming you, things like cleanup tags is something new users aren't aware of. TheBlazikenMaster 16:09, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]