Jump to content

Talk:Tropical Storm Cristobal (2008)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleTropical Storm Cristobal (2008) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 24, 2008Good article nomineeListed

Published

[edit]

Because coastal watches and warnings are out. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 09:36, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help!!!

[edit]

Hi. I tried to update the commons image as usual, but the NHC image is screwed up and the commons image has been protected, see commons:User talk:Keith Edkins. Thanks. ~AH1(TCU) 18:05, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They protected it because the admin wants us to upload a new image for each advisory, which is rediculous. -CWY2190(talk • contributions) 18:11, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Responded to that guy's message with a situation I had before. -- RattleMan 18:13, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That is absurd. Just upload them locally as Image:2008 02L 5-day track.gif and Image:2008 03L 5-day track.gif and screw Commons. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 18:19, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. no personal attacks, please, and I've commented on the admin's talkpage, to notify him of the objections, and what about the NHC image, it is screwed up. Thanks. ~AH1(TCU) 18:23, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Can you make a personal attack against a website? Unless this commons guy is a person... -CWY2190(talk • contributions) 18:26, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
While I wonder how on Earth that's a personal attack (if the Wikimedia Commons decides to make it hard on us to update images, then we're just not going to use Commons), I'm commenting there as well. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 18:27, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've uploaded a local copy of the image that we can use until/if this is sorted out. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 18:35, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please continue any discussions of this issue here. Adambro (talk) 18:43, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's unprotected in Commons now, so we can upload them there again. I'll delete the local copy. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 19:09, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. One more question, is the NHC issuing 2am, 8am, 2pm, and 8pm advisories for this storm? If so, then why was the advisory at 11am advisory 3 and the 5pm advisory 4, and when does NHC usually start issuing 3-hour advisories? Also, why was the previous image screwed up and will it happen again? Thanks. ~AH1(TCU) 22:37, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The intermediate advisories are issued whenever there are watches and/or warnings in effect. A full advisory is issued at 3z, 9z, 15z, and 21z (11p, 5a, 11a, 5p EDT). In this case, the 11a advisory was #3, the 2p intermediate advisory was #3a, and the full 5p advisory was #4. -CWY2190(talk • contributions) 22:40, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Working

[edit]

We need to work alot more on this article.... Itfc+canes=me (talk) 15:14, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So be bold and dig in! Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 15:19, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rainfall graphic

[edit]

Expect the rainfall graphic to be produced on Monday or Tuesday. I'm waiting for the post storm/hurricane reports (PSH) to be issued by the Morehead City, NC WFO, and still have to add the CoCoRAHS data. Thegreatdr (talk) 23:19, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is done. Thegreatdr (talk) 17:10, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Differences near the end of the life cycle of Cristobal between TPC and HPC

[edit]

...are best explained by checking out the TPC surface analysis archive. Thegreatdr (talk) 21:43, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Tropical Storm Cristobal (2008)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA, and should have the full review up within a few hours. Dana boomer (talk) 12:18, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    • In the "Storm history" section, you say "Cristobal remained a fairly weak tropical storm as it tracked adjacent to the Carolina coast, although Cristobal never made landfall. ". Please reword this to avoid using "Cristobal" twice in the same sentence.
    • In the "Impact" section, you say "224 mm (8.8 in) of rain was reported at Baccaro Point". Starting sentences with numerals is discouraged.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    • In references where you have both the first and last name of the author, the last name should come first.
    • I guess I never realized that a guideline was needed for this. Last name, first name is how authors are always cited in academic papers from all disciplines, books, and in all citation styling. If you look at WP:REF you will see that every time they give a reference example, the format is last name, first name. Dana boomer (talk) 13:52, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    • There is no naming section. This is because it's a 2008 storm and they haven't released the naming reports yet, true?
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Overall, a well-written article. I am putting the article on hold to allow time to deal with the few minor issues I have mentioned above. If you have questions, you can ask here on the review page or on my talk page. Dana boomer (talk) 12:29, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. Replies are above. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 12:55, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Everything looks good, so I'm passing the article. Thanks to both of you for your hard work! Dana boomer (talk) 13:09, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical Cyclone Report Available

[edit]

The article needs to be updated according to the TCR. [1] Cyclonebiskit (talk) 01:52, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tropical Storm Cristobal (2008). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:53, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tropical_Storm_Cristobal_(2008)&oldid=1211233781"