Jump to content

Talk:Tropical Storm Ana (2009)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleTropical Storm Ana (2009) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 27, 2009Good article nomineeListed

Rainfall graphics

[edit]

While the graphics for Ana have been prepared for Puerto Rico, the legend needs to be modified to correspond to San Juan's preliminary tropical cyclone report, which was issued at the same time the graphics were produced. The amount was similar, but not identical. The modification will be made on Monday. Thegreatdr (talk) 13:04, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for keeping us up to date David :) Cyclonebiskit (talk) 18:50, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whare can you get all this information fo other storms?

[edit]

I want to be able to help! Syntheticalconnections (talk) 04:38, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you elaborate please? Darren23Edits|Mail 05:18, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Tropical Storm Ana (2009)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ealdgyth - Talk 15:55, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be reviewing this article shortly. Ealdgyth - Talk 15:55, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Some spots of jargon and some places where the meaning isn't clear
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Specific concerns

  • Lead:
    • Jargon: "non-convective remnant" needs linking or expaining.
    • More jargon: "increasing wind shear" needs explaining to those not hurricane buffs
    • Any reason you've linked Dominican Republic but not Lesser Antilles and Puerto Rico?
    • I think something is missing in this sentence: "In Puerto Rico, up to 2.76 in (70 mm), causing street flooding and forcing the evacuation of three schools." up to 2.76 in what?
  • Meteorological history:
    • "After slowly organizing for a few days, the NHC declared that the system had developed into a tropical depression, the second of the season, early on August 11 while located roughly 280 mi (455 km) west of the Cape Verde Islands." is very ... convoluted. Suggest breaking into two sentences.
    • I don't understand "Gradual intensification of the depression was anticipated as it tracked over marginally warm sea surface temperatures and into an area of low wind shear; however, dry air would limit the strengthening.", what exactly was the sequence? Was it expected to intensify, but didn't because of dry air? If so, you need to reword to make this clearer ..
    • "Shortly after, it was determined, in post-storm analysis, that Ana had degenerated into a tropical wave, no longer a tropical cyclone." convoluted wording suggest rewording.
I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow folks to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. Ealdgyth - Talk 16:11, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think ive sorted evrey thing out.Jason Rees (talk) 08:20, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Tropical Storm Ana (2009). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:34, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Tropical Storm Ana (2009). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:31, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tropical_Storm_Ana_(2009)&oldid=1211232198"