Talk:Tobruk (video game)

Tobruk (video game) has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 4, 2016	Good article nominee	Listed

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (6 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (2 participants)
Dr. Wily (6 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (4 participants)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (6 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (7 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tobruk (video game)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 15:35, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lede

I would add 1941 before Siege of Tobruk and in Gameplay section.

Added in lead and gameplay JAGUAR 16:02, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gameplay

Mmm in reading 1st paragraph of Gameplay I feel like I'm reading the lede again, can you reword the lede or Gameplay to make it sound more different?

I agree, I've tried to reword both slightly JAGUAR 16:02, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Background

"in what Cockayne admitted in a retrospective interview that "he took his eye off the ball"." -wording doesn't quite fit. Try "Following years of successful sales throughout the mid 1980s, Personal Software Services experienced financial difficulties, during a period where Cockayne later admitted that he "took his eye off the ball".

Rephrased to this, thanks! JAGUAR 16:02, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Good job!♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:15, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! JAGUAR 16:17, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]