Talk:Theta Tau/Archive 1

Archive 1

External links

There's no reason to list each individual chapter on the link section as there is already a link to all of the chapters. Thus, I'm removing the individual chapter links. --Clarkbhm 16:46, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

As a response to this I added in all of the chapter links into the table that lists all the chapters. I think that solves the problem. Natantus 15:45, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Why all the red links?

Why all the red links to non-notable people who will never have a Wiki article written about them? It makes the article look like it's nowhere near finished... ClarkBHM 18:07, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

I'd say pull them... not that it's not hilarious to imply our Grand Regent is a reggae singer from NY... :) --ShadowRAM (talk) 06:54, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Installation Dates

Anyone want to lookup and add the installation dates for each chapter? ClarkBHM (talk) 02:12, 19 April 2010 (UTC) I did the inactive chapters and all the single letter actives. I'll work on the rest later. --ShadowRAM (talk) 21:53, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Notable alumni

Simply put, what's with all the italics in this section? Freddiem (talk) 17:47, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Good point. I removed them all. ClarkBHM (talk) 03:13, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Merging the Active and Inactive lists.

Would anyone have kittens if I combined the active and Inactive lists with the addition of one column for activity? I can't come up with many other GLOs where the active and inactive lists are split like this.Naraht (talk) 21:18, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

I support this change. Jax MN (talk) 05:39, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Professional Fraternity

In the article's introduction, Theta Tau is claimed to be the oldest and largest professional engineering fraternity, at which point it is linked to the "Professional Fraternity" article. This is misleading, as it is not the oldest professional fraternity. Additionally, the claim to being the largest needs a citation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.27.98.83 (talk) 02:04, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Proposed Restore of chapter conduct

The recently removed section on chapter conduct is quite suitable for the article, we have many other fraternity articles where similar chapter conduct issues are covered.Naraht (talk) 17:03, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

That was not intentional on my part. Thanks for the catch. Rublamb (talk) 00:07, 29 March 2023 (UTC)