Talk:The Void (video game)

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (7 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (3 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

My preemptive appologies for practices and customs I may neglect and any faux pas I may commit in my unfamiliarity with WikiEtiquette. Since this game's theoretical English release date is drawing near (there's only about a week of October 2009 left) and since this talk page is almost entirely empty I feel I should contribute in some way to the article's improvement. The first matter that came to my attention was some copy-editing that may be required for the article on the whole, which I, barring objection, will do myself as I am capable. There are, however, a couple of other issues which I might demonstrate, but which do not feel qualified to address. Section Gameplay: This section should be improved to better demonstrate gameplay and more accurately explain how the game is played. Additionally, the sentence The game has a fixed time limit of 35 cycles leaves me with no valuable information, as I am not familiar with the usage of "cycle" in this context and it is not explained previously in the article. Section Reception: This section is inconsistent in how quotes from reviews are formatted. That's all, folks. 216.68.193.89 (talk) 23:07, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your advice on how to change the article, and your simple changes. I will look into Wiki editing recommendations and try to edit the article more accordingly. For now, could you help on what licence type I should use for the screenshots, so that they don't get deleted? I'm one of the developers of this game, and own the rights to them. The LxR (talk) 11:07, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PEGI/USK Rating

Does anybody know whats up with the PEGI and USK ratings? It seems like the PEGI12+ is for the UK release by Odyssia. The German release by Atari I have here is PEGI 16+ and USK12, on the web I can however also find pictures of the game with an USK16/PEGI16+ rating. -- Grumbel (talk) 15:23, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]