Talk:The Odd Gentlemen
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
_%22BIG_GOMEZ%22.svg)
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
Request edit on 5 July 2015
[edit] | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Some or all of the changes weren't supported by neutral, independent, reliable sources. Consider re-submitting with content based on media, books and scholarly works. |
| This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Some or all of the changes weren't supported by neutral, independent, reliable sources. Consider re-submitting with content based on media, books and scholarly works. |
Content suggestion : controversy. New development that needs fact-checking and sourcing as it unfolds : http://web.archive.org/web/20150704223505/http://ipgd.tumblr.com/post/123230861032/im-sure-that-everyone-has-noticed-by-now-that-the The allegation of criminal embezzlement during the involvement with the company "What Pumpkin?", verification required. 94.72.195.178 (talk) 03:48, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
(The above requested edit was made by clicking on a link in an automatically added notice.)
- The problem is that it isn't currently covered by any reliable sources. We can't use a web archive of someone posting something to tumblr as a source (we couldn't use tumblr as a source for something that controversial even if they hadn't taken it down.) Unless it gets picked up by somewhere more reliable, there's not much we can do here. --Aquillion (talk) 18:52, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
-Isn't the controversy itself notable? It seems, at least from cursory googling, that there are a lot of extremely pissed off people re: the alleged theft. I think it's worth saying that The Odd Gentleman has been accused of stealing money from the Homestuck campaign.
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Odd Gentlemen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://blog.theoddgentlemen.com/post/89512388164/the-odd-gentlemen-are-making-the-homestuck-game
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:49, 1 April 2016 (UTC)