Jump to content

Talk:The El Dorado

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Name of the building

[edit]

See Talk:The Dakota#Requested move for a discussion about using "the" in the name of an article about an apartment building in NYC's Category:Central Park West Historic District.

See also Talk:The Dakota#Request for comment which has a slightly different focus. --Enkyo2 (talk) 19:04, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's "The El Dorado" not "The Eldorado"

[edit]

The name of this building is the "El Dorado" (with a space between the two words) and not the "Eldorado" (with no space). "El Dorado" is, among other things, the name displayed on the building's awning (see "Category:The El Dorado with awning showing name" in wikicommons for photos).

Changing the name of the article from "The Eldorado" to "The El Dorado" seems like the obvious thing to do, so I'll do it in a few days (with a redirect from the current name) unless somebody else either changes it before I do, or knows of some reason not to change it. UrielAcosta (talk) 21:38, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(3 Days later): Okay, I've moved the article.

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk09:42, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The El Dorado
The El Dorado
  • ... that when the pastor of an African-American church bought the El Dorado, one newspaper wrote that "its occupants are white, and were white"? Source: Hicks, James L. (January 16, 1960). "Daddy Grace Dead- Millions Mourn: 'He Told Us He Was Going,' Followers Sav Gone To Another Kingdom Daddy Is Dead!". New York Amsterdam News. p. 1.

5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 13:31, 25 May 2022 (UTC).[reply]

New enough, long enough, very well cited, hooks cited inline, QPQ complete. The pictures are fantastic, and I think a possible alternate is the second image in the article, with appropriate cropping, as the skyline is more striking. Suggestion: finding this article is surprisingly difficult - try it. I think some more hatnotes are needed on other pages.Maury Markowitz (talk) 14:37, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:The El Dorado/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Bruxton (talk · contribs) 17:41, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Review

[edit]
  • I look forward to reviewing this article.

Lead

[edit]
  • Green tickY "The base contains several small setbacks to comply with the 1916 Zoning Resolution." I did not find this information in the body.
  • Green tickY "Two towers rise from the eastern portion of the base above the 19th story." i did not find this information int he body
  • Green tickY All other facts are supported by citations in the body. The lead is a good summary of the article.

Images

[edit]

Spelling and grammar

[edit]

Other

[edit]
  • Green tickY Development - $ at first occurrence US$8.5 million MOS:MONEY alsoSomeone educated me on MOS:MONEY - I still think it is a minor "best practice" but the guideline does not say it is needed in this article
  • ? Consider adding inflation templates {{US$|62.50|1963|long=no}}. I find them interesting Bruxton (talk) 13:27, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

[edit]
  • Green tickY Site - citations check out
  • Green tickY Previous structure - citations check out
  • Green tickY Architecture - citations check out
  • Green tickY Form and facade - citations check out
  • Green tickY Base - citations check out
  • Green tickY Towers - citations check out
  • Green tickY Features - citations check out
  • Green tickY History - citations check out
  • Green tickY Development - citations check out
  • Green tickY Rental house - citations check out
  • Green tickY Cooperative conversion - citations check out
  • Green tickY Residents - citations check out
  • Green tickY Impact - citations check out
  • Many were spot checked by me.

Chart

[edit]
Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. Yes
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Yes
2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. Yes
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). Yes
2c. it contains no original research. Yes
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. Yes
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. Yes
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Yes
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Yes
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Yes
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. Yes
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. Yes
7. Overall assessment. Another good one!
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Film and TV

[edit]

is it worth inserting a list of the films and TV shows the building has been used in (Ghostbusters, Home Alone 2 etc.)? 146.200.132.123 (talk) 09:08, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]