Talk:The El Dorado/GA1

GA Review

Passed. Bruxton (talk) 14:24, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Bruxton (talk · contribs) 17:41, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review

I look forward to reviewing this article.

Lead

Y "The base contains several small setbacks to comply with the 1916 Zoning Resolution." I did not find this information in the body.
- I've removed the 1916 Zoning Resolution, as it's not actually mentioned in the article. Epicgenius (talk) 23:43, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Y "Two towers rise from the eastern portion of the base above the 19th story." i did not find this information int he body
- I've fixed this. The architecture section says "two 12-story towers rise from the eastern portion of the base." Epicgenius (talk) 23:43, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Y All other facts are supported by citations in the body. The lead is a good summary of the article.

Images

Y The article has eight images and they are clear, and properly licensed. The images also appear in the sections where they illustrate the content of the text. Bruxton (talk) 17:55, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling and grammar

Y Site section "The Majestic Apartments occupies a nearly square land lot" I am unsure how this fits in the article. Might need to add context or a set up in the paragraph?
- Oops, I meant "El Dorado". Epicgenius (talk) 23:48, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Y Architecture section "while Margon & Holder were responsible for building's Art Deco" missing a word
- Fixed. Epicgenius (talk) 23:43, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
? Base section "an incised geometric pattern. On the third story." might be an errant period here
- I think this was already changed to a comma before I started editing the article. Epicgenius (talk) 23:43, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Y Towers section "There are terracotta balconies at the 26th story" might read better with "on"?
- Fixed. Epicgenius (talk) 23:43, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Y Cooperative conversion section "Balconies in central grouping of upper stories" are we missing a determiner before central?
- Fixed. Epicgenius (talk) 23:43, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Other

Y Development - ~~$ at first occurrence US$8.5 million MOS:MONEY also~~Someone educated me on MOS:MONEY - I still think it is a minor "best practice" but the guideline does not say it is needed in this article
? Consider adding inflation templates {{US$|62.50|1963|long=no}}. I find them interesting Bruxton (talk) 13:27, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

Y Site - citations check out
Y Previous structure - citations check out
Y Architecture - citations check out
Y Form and facade - citations check out
Y Base - citations check out
Y Towers - citations check out
Y Features - citations check out
Y History - citations check out
Y Development - citations check out
Y Rental house - citations check out
Y Cooperative conversion - citations check out
Y Residents - citations check out
Y Impact - citations check out
Many were spot checked by me.

Chart

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Yes
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Yes
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Yes
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Yes
	2c. it contains no original research.	Yes
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	Yes
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Yes
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Yes
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Yes
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Yes
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Yes
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Yes
	7. Overall assessment.	Another good one!

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.