Talk:The Amazing Spider-Man: Web of Fire

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Sega task force.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Gilman Louie (1 participant)
Yoshimitsu (1 participant)
Dr. Wily (2 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (2 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (4 participants)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (6 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (7 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Comics: Marvel / Spider-Man Bottom‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles

Bottom

This article has been rated as Bottom-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related work groups:
/
	This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.
	This article is supported by Spider-Man work group.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Absence of reviews

I've removed the "citation needed" tag from the following statement, along with the cited source which does not support that statement: "GamePro and Game Players gave it only brief reviews, while other gaming publications such as Electronic Gaming Monthly, GameSpot and Next Generation gave it no coverage at all beyond early previews." I thought this would be obvious, but the chance of there being a source which states a negative like this is virtually 0%. If you don't believe me when I say that these publications never reviewed The Amazing Spider-Man: Web of Fire or otherwise gave it any coverage in the 32X's final months, then just remove the statement; I won't try to stop you. WP:No original research says that original research should be removed, not tagged. Martin IIIa (talk) 14:44, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]