Talk:Team Liquid
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tournament Achievements
[edit]Firstly, should notable achievements really include placings lower than 3rd? That seems odd to me. Secondly, I'm really not sure whether the achievements of the Team Curse rosters prior to joining Team Liquid should be included in this list, as they were not Team Liquid's achievements. I would move to create a separate Team Curse page, as I believe the organisation's involvement in eSports is significant enough to warrant it, and to migrate the achievements and history of the roster under Team Curse to that page. Fred BR (talk) 10:20, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- In my opinion it should just represent all notable tournaments that they have entered, regardless of how well or poorly the team placed. Otherwise it starts looking like a resume and violates Neutral point of view.--Prisencolinensinainciusol (talk) 07:23, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
- It doesn't at all, every single sports team on Wikipedia lists notable accomplishments. It's not violating any kind of neutrality to differentiate between what is important and what is not. Try reading the guidelines you link and maybe do a tiny bit of research? Fred BR (talk) 04:14, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- It's very likely that those pages you're referring to violate the policies too. Besides there are also pages such as List of New York Knicks seasons, which lists every single season the team has played regardless of outcome.--Prisencolinensinainciusol (talk) 19:18, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
I dont play LoL, so I cant judge the importance of all the placings, but the list seems a bit long, compared to the Dota 2 list that only lists TIs and Majors.--Chaosquo (talk) 15:30, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Page Split
[edit]The page is getting a bit messy considering how two major aspects are being discussed, the team and the website. It should probably be split and this page could be made into a disambiguation page to keep both pages at a decent length and to remove clutter. Draconicfire (talk) 04:08, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
SupportSeems like a good idea, since the two is more or less separate. In the near future as esports gets more coverage it may even be necessary various game divisions from the main team page. It might be better to call the esports team Team Liquid Pro, seeing as its a more natural disambiguation and how the organization refers to itself.--Prisencolin (talk) 14:26, 16 November 2015 (UTC)- Edit:striking vote, no longer in support, no sources for standalone article--Prisencolin (talk) 08:57, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Strong Support- This page is very confusing with both of them combined. If they split, both of them will still have decent content. Dat GuyTalkContribs 06:44, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Strong Support- Agree with the arguments given above. Fred BR (talk) 20:01, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Support- The websites and the teams are pretty independent from each other. Creating its own article for Liquipedia might be worth it as well, since esports wikis got pretty important in the scenes, but i might be biased on that one, since i am staff for Liquipedia. FO-nTTaX (talk) 15:12, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Support- Totally makes sense — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.178.111.28 (talk) 05:10, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
- Where is the sourcing to warrant the split to a separate "website" article? If none shows up, the section would just be merged right back. As it stands, the stuff without sourcing in the article should be reduced if it cannot be referenced. czar 00:42, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose The article is about the team and its community website that was created by the same people. I think it should be one article. --Frmorrison (talk) 20:10, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Page Split, Part Two
[edit]As of April 2019, the original "Team Liquid" website (teamliquid.net) has rebranded to "TLnet" and moved domains to tl.net. This is an intentional separation of the website and team, as outlined in the post explaining the move: https://tl.net/forum/general/545373-teamliquidnet-becomes-tlnet. Given this, I'd like to reconsider splitting the website and team pages on Wikipedia too. 2001:470:1F15:D55:C07B:C237:7A5E:3A01 (talk) 14:46, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
- The website itself may not meet the guidelines for a standalone article. It does not have enough coverage from third party sources and is a part of the Team Liquid organization. CentreLeftRight ✉ 02:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:29, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (sports and games) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (sports and games) articles
- Sports and games work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class video game articles
- Mid-importance video game articles
- C-Class Esports articles
- Esports task force articles
- WikiProject Video games articles
- C-Class organization articles
- Low-importance organization articles
- WikiProject Organizations articles
- C-Class Book articles
- Reference works task force articles
- WikiProject Books articles