Talk:Statler and Waldorf

Disney Mid‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Too many quotes

The quotes section is really too long - a couple of the best should be selected with the rest being transwikied to Wikiquote. Thryduulf 15:54, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good idea. One of my favorite Statler & Waldorf quotes is:

-I think Gonzo should quit while he's ahead.

-Gonzo should quit while he's alive!

-Ho ho ho ho ho!

I could imagine them saying the same thing about David Blaine. Chris 17:21, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

quote explanation

- Ah that's nothing, anyone can drop their pants

- I didn't know you were Lithuanian

What the heck does that mean? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sysy (talk • contribs) 03:26, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. For reference, the quote was added by 85.220.107.98 on 22 August 2006; this was the only edit from that IP address, and also added "better get out your old army uniform" (which I don't get either) and "Where is the land of the rising sun?" (which I do, and which sounds like just the sort of joke S&W would crack). Emurphy42 15:07, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

-It was a joke specific to the show. Spike Milligan was the guest, and as part of his act he dropped his pants to show his Union Jack boxers. The implication is that Waldorf had the Lithuanian flag on his. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.84.20.23 (talk) 21:53, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

-It's also a sly reference to an old joke. When a man's genitals are exposed, an observer notes, "I didn't know you were Jewish" - implying the man is circumcised. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.78.245.182 (talk) 20:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong or what?

""It is believed that the full names of the two are Jason D. Statler and Jon D. Waldorf, named after the founders of the Statler and Waldorf hotels."" I checked and Statler and Waldrof hotels weren't founded by "Jon D Waldorf" or "Jason D Statler" but by Ellsworth Milton Statler and the Waldorf-Astoria cousins, Willaim and John Jacob... No single Jason, no single D as a middle name. This needs quotations, justifications, etc.Undead Herle King 12:18, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to the Muppet Wiki pages Waldorf's first name is Conrad. Another pun on the hotel connection : The Conrad Hilton. --Fkvdmark (talk) 09:29, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quotes?

Where are all the quotes? They have been deleted from the site and they are not in Wikiquote. When will they appear there? Oh and a good advice:

Give Statler and Waldorf their own page on Wikiquote with a link to the Muppet Show. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.231.245.199 (talk) 15:27, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Trading Places

The first time I saw the movie Trading Places I was struck by how Randolph and Mortimer Duke (played by Ralph Bellamy and Don Ameche) resembled Statler and Waldorf. Or rather, Statler and Waldorf could serve as caricatures of Randolph and Mortimer. They even sound similar. I know it's coincidental; after all, he casting director of Trading Places didn't pick those two guys for their resemblance to the Muppet duo... or did they? Anyone else notice this? Or is this original research on my part? -209.225.225.89 23:11, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

____________________________________________ Exactly why I am researching the Duke bros and S&W

___________________________________________ I have no idea if this was or wasn't, but I noticed that too. It could be coincidence or a calculated maneuver. 24.8.50.83 (talk) 03:45, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

____________________________________________ I agree. In my memory from watching Trading Places I actually thought the Dukes were called Statler and Waldorf! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.170.146.85 (talk) 22:04, 3 January 2014 (UTC) ____________________________________________ add me to the list. i always assumed that S&W were a spoof of them...altho i now see that the muppet versions were, in fact, FIRST. seems a bit odd for the humans to have been picked for any resemblance in the other direction, but who knows? maybe subconsciously the producer/casting dir had them in mind somehow. 209.172.23.57 (talk) 01:30, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Youtube heckleu24

The characters have a series of videos on Youtube as user heckleu247. Might want to add that information to the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.247.38.242 (talk) 17:50, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

&

This article has been renamed from Statler & Waldorf to Statler and Waldorf as the result of a move request.

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was - move as per naming conventions. Keith D (talk) 17:58, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

why is this listed as "Statler & Waldorf" and not "Statler and Waldorf"?

Statler&Waldorf 17:33, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. it goes against naming conventions. I've proposed a move. Newbie27 (talk) 01:28, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Fair use rationale for Image:StatlerAndWaldorf.jpg

Image:StatlerAndWaldorf.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:22, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Waldorf's wife

Hi:

I think she appeared once. Her name was, predictably, Astoria. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.157.183.193 (talk) 23:12, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

mention Staldorf and Watler?

Should the article mention Staldorf and Watler? They are two characters from Storm Hawks television show. stormhawks.com describes them as "prickly" so I'm guessing they are inspired by Statler and Waldorf. --EarthFurst (talk) 05:39, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"It is commonly, although erroneously, believed that the models for these characters were Dr. Ainsley James Grant and the Right Honorable Joseph O'Banion."

Are either of these people real or is this a hoax? AlmostReadytoFly (talk) 11:50, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In Pixar's PRESTO

Do we know that is really them at the 2:38 mark in the film? We need a citation from an independent 3rd party confirming that it's not a coincidential lookalike. SpikeJones (talk) 20:45, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Origins of Waldorf

In a commercial 1969 film made by Henson for IBM "The Paperwork Explosion", an old man appears who is very clearly the model for Waldorf. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_IZw2CoYztk — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pemboid (talk • contribs) 10:07, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May be a stupid question

But Who is who? --37.24.9.83 (talk) 22:03, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See the image in the infobox and the caption. GoingBatty (talk) 23:45, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Brothers Grimm

"Other appearances" earlier included, as the last listing, "Statler and Waldorf both appeared in the 2005 film The Brothers Grimm, where they both serve as supporting characters, comedy reliefs, and residents of the village of Marbaden, as they both help the Grimms (Matt Damon and Heath Ledger) out with their adventure, as they provide some comic relief, and comment on the events throughout the entire film." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.143.148.186 (talk) 20:39, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Old Vaudeville gag

It was an old gag in vaudeville acts to name a character after the classiest hotel in the city they were playing. Even the Marx Brothers called Margaret Dumont "Mrs. Rittenhouse" in some of their movies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.128.62.1 (talk) 19:06, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Statler and Waldorf. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130515222329/http://blogs.static.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/21354.html to http://blogs.static.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/21354.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:38, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Statler and Waldorf. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:33, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]