Talk:Spider-Man and the X-Men in Arcade's Revenge

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Gilman Louie (1 participant)
Yoshimitsu (1 participant)
Dr. Wily (2 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (2 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (4 participants)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (6 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (7 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Difficulty Section

This definitely need to either be shortened or removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.24.119.11 (talk) 17:36, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No way. This game is best known for being ridiculously difficult. Everybody I know who has ever played this game ALWAYS starts off by talking about how hard the game is, myself included. I guarantee if this game was easy, nobody would ever talk about it. The game's high difficulty is what makes people love it and hate it at the same time. This is the only game I ever went on YouTube to see what the ending is just because I've never come close to beating this game on my own. Contributions/63.81.133.153 (talk) 18:26, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It needs to be rewritten at the very least. It is extremely un-encyclopedic, there are no sources, and overall just sounds like an article from a magazine. DaddyTwoFoot (talk) 23:01, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:SpidermanxmenSNES boxart.jpg

Image:SpidermanxmenSNES boxart.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:39, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]