Talk:Soulcalibur V
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Soulcalibur V article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Soulcalibur V" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Soulcalibur V. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Soulcalibur V at the Reference desk. |
Nightmare's In
[edit]Nightmare was confirmed to be in the game along with Ivy. 207.216.197.154 (talk) 02:20, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
New Characters
[edit]A kunoichi (female ninja) trained by Taki is going to be one of the new characters. Ref: http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110715161627/soulcalibur/images/5/5b/NewFemaleNinjaChar.jpg 207.216.222.107 (talk) 01:52, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
Kilik and Maxi?
[edit]When will this info be revealed? --Ujaj35 (talk) 15:18, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for Maxi. --Ujaj35 (talk) 20:28, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Ezio not confirmed
[edit]Ezio's been rumored, but there's a good chance that that leak is fake. Don't put him under confirmed until an official source has stated he actually is confirmed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShadowZeroKaras (talk • contribs) 05:16, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Katsuhiro Harada
[edit]Would he count as a guest character? He's a pre-made custom character that uses the Devil Jin style.
http://soulcalibur.wikia.com/wiki/Katsuhiro_Harada — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.111.151.194 (talk) 23:17, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Characters
[edit]The list of Soul characters is located at List of Soul characters.
Also, remember to SOURCE ALL CONTENT. --194.145.185.229 (talk) 17:10, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Reception
[edit]So when will more reviews be added? Looking kind of vacant at the moment. http://www.blisteredthumbs.net/2012/01/soul-calibur-v-review/
There's blisteredthumbs review of the game. They slammed it pretty hard, as the game made alot of changes, though not exactly in ways people liked.--Chipmonk328 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.89.121.187 (talk) 17:46, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Can we just delete the reception section until someone has the time to do it properly? It reads like a bad message board rant as it stands now, listing minor websites and giving opinions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.112.30.90 (talk) 04:56, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
I added the Metacritic scores but I don't have the HTML language skills to fix it or add anything substantial. At least not as the article stands now. If the formatting was better I could try but it seems like a rather pointless effort as the entry currently stands. Oh well. This article here really needs some work done. Rjcripe (talk) 06:18, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
What a horrible article
[edit]Apparently no one really cares about this game. --194.145.185.229 (talk) 15:45, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
So when I make an edit, it gets immediately removed by some troll's bot, yet when a true vandal makes an edit, it is gonna stay there for a period of time. All hail Wikipedia Learve (talk) 05:59, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
I tried to fix it but my HTML skills are seriously lacking. Is there some way to flag an article for admin or mod review? A way to get people with some semi-decent HTML language skill to come in and clean a bit? The article really doesn't need much more content, it just needs to look better than it does right now... Rjcripe (talk) 06:15, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
- It's a bit better now. --Jtalledo (talk) 15:43, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
It is a bit worse, now. ≈ Learve (talk) 04:01, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- No, it's not. But if it was, you should feel free to be bold and improve it yourself then. As opposed, to you know, just whining. I worked hard to get some actual content and sources in this article, per standards and for somebody just to come along and just tear it down with a whopping six words is not cool. You don't like it? Change it. Or at least say why. --Jtalledo (talk) 16:57, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- Jtalledo come on, it was such an obvious troll. The article's fine. --Niemti (talk) 17:27, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Japanese Artbook
[edit]An artbook was recently released in Japan that contains a ton of background information on Soul Calibur V. Should we mention this? 207.216.193.21 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:40, 8 April 2012 (UTC).
The artbook is mentioned, but if you mean citing it as a source, then yes, of course. --Niemti (talk) 17:29, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
B assessment
[edit]It's not bad. It's the sections that are holding back a B assessment. Merge Plot and Characters (make Characters a subsection of Plot), Separate Development and Release. --JDC808 ♫ 16:25, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
Tira cosplay pic
[edit]Do you believe cosplay photos of Soulcalibur V characters would be useful here? Here's a pic of Tira cosplay, do you think it should be added? Cogiati (talk) 20:33, 26 May 2013 (UTC)