Talk:Snyk

This article was nominated for deletion on 15 March 2022. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 17 December 2021 by reviewer Timtrent (talk · contribs).

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Text and/or other creative content from [nil Snyk Code] was copied or moved into [[Snyk]]. The former page's [ history] now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional. To be honest, I'm not sure which part of it could be construed as promotional. What was written was done so in an encyclopedic manner. If you could point out what is promotional, will adjust the language accordingly. Thank you --MaskedSinger (talk) 09:41, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Startup?

Started in 2015. We are almost at the end of 2021. If it hasn't started up by now then it has failed. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 19:02, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A company valued at $8.5 billion [1] is not a Startup any more, it is a very successful company. It is awkward that there is no article about this company in Wikipedia. דוד שי (talk) 11:30, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Never assume good faith

After trying to edit this draft I believe that the nice rule "Assume good faith" was changed into "Never assume good faith" as far as people outside Wikipedia are concerned. I learned that an announcement by a company about acquisition of another company is not enough. Why? Is every company a liar by default? I tried to bring Crunchbase as a reference, but it was denied by some filter. דוד שי (talk) 11:30, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@דוד שי Please try not to be silly about this, and do not introduce faux-references.

We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS please. See WP:42. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 11:32, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am sure that a software company valued at $8.5 billion is suitable for an article in the English Wikipedia. If the rules prevent it, something is wrong in the rules. דוד שי (talk) 12:08, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A company's value has no bearing on it's notability. Theroadislong (talk) 12:10, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@דוד שי If you believe it to pass Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) please do the work to prove it. Arguing the toss will not achieve anything. Proving it with excellence of referencing will.

You have the opportunity to argue for policy changes. Your voice carries as much weight as does any other editor's. Please express arguments for your desired change at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Speaking about it on this draft's talk page will achieve nothing at all Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 14:34, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Acceptance at AFC

In my view this was borderline to accept. Rather than allowing it to languish and eventually fall foul of G13 I chose to accept it and allow the community to reach a conclusion. I view some of the referencing to need replacement or excision Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 09:05, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is this the acquirer of Snyk Code?

See, currently, Draft:Snyk Code. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 09:49, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a confused draft. "Snyk Code" is the result of the acquisition of DeepCode. Loew Galitz (talk) 03:27, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]