Talk:Serbo-Croatian grammar

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Serbo-Croatian grammar article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 12 months

Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting, and read through the list of highlighted discussions below before starting a new one:

The term "Serbo-Croatian" is here used as the common English name of the language of the Serb, Croat, Bosniak, and Montenegrin peoples, a name which has been used with this meaning since the 19th century, long before the establishment of Yugoslavia. If you disagree with the name, the appropriate response is to request that it be renamed.
There was consensus on merging the old Serbian and Croatian grammar articles; if you want them back, the appropriate course is to request that this article be split. However, bear in mind that such a split is likely to be considered redundant, which is why they were merged in the first place.
The grammar presented in this article is Shtokavian. It is shared by all four ethnic standards. Differences between the standards may be covered here, but also in more detail at Differences between standard Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian. Adding twenty sections of "Serbian and Croatian are not the same!!!!!!" does nothing to improve the article, and will therefore be deleted.
If you wish to refer us to another page, or to an old version of this article, the appropriate means is to link to it. Please don't paste page after page of text or tables clipped from other articles. That adds nothing to the discussion and makes this talk page difficult to navigate, and will therefore be deleted.

Languages Mid‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bosnia and Herzegovina Mid‑importance

	Bosnia and Herzegovina portal Serbo-Croatian grammar is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Bosnia and HerzegovinaWikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaTemplate:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaBosnia and Herzegovina articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Croatia Mid‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Montenegro Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montenegro, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Montenegro on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontenegroWikipedia:WikiProject MontenegroTemplate:WikiProject MontenegroMontenegro articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Serbia Mid‑importance

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yugoslavia Mid‑importance

	Serbo-Croatian grammar is within the scope of WikiProject Yugoslavia, a collaborative effort to improve the Wikipedia coverage of articles related to Yugoslavia and its nations. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.YugoslaviaWikipedia:WikiProject YugoslaviaTemplate:WikiProject YugoslaviaYugoslavia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

Palatal

There is something profoundly unclear about this article: there are inflection patterns given for palatal consonants with examples that do not correspond to what the Serbo-Croatian phonology article defines as such, namely nj, ć, đ, j, and lj. The word "prišt", given as one example, contains no such sound. If the definition of palatal in grammar is different from the definition in phonology, we should definitely mention this; I am not an expert, so I can't make such an edit myself but, as it is now, the article is confusing. complainer (talk) 07:19, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Addressed, now. The proper nomenclature is "soft", which only partially corresponds with palatal consonants. There are some "soft" consonants which are actually reflexes of old phonemes: št in prišt - prištevi is reflex of proto-Slavic /щ/, while e.g. r in car - carevi (cf. bor - borovi) comes from Old Church Slavonic цaрь 'tzar', the soft sign denoting a palatalization. No such user (talk) 09:26, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Definite and indefinite adjectives

The examples of declensions of adjectives given in the article are wrong. Adjectives also have grammatical aspect, but not perfective or imperfective, but definite or indefinite. "velik" is indefinite, while "veliki" is definite. Ex: "Vidio sam velik zid" - I saw a big wall. "Vidio sam veliki zid" - I saw the big wall. The declensions are also quite different in the masculine, while feminine and neuter retain a difference only in accents. So for masculine indefinite, it would go something like this:

N velik veliki

G velika velikih

D veliku velikim

Ac velik velike

V velik veliki

I velikim velikim

L veliku velikim

And for masculine definite, it would be like this

N veliki veliki

G velikog velikih

D velikom velikim

Ac veliki velike

V veliki veliki

I velikim velikim

L velikom velikim

It would seem that someone made a mix of these two separate declensions.

P.S.: In the plural, the difference is in the accent, with the final vowel being lengthened. 92.36.135.59 (talk) 00:40, 10 April 2017 (UTC) Corrected. Burzuchius (talk) 16:10, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Imperfect and aorist

Isn't it that the imperfect is restricted imperfective verbs, whereas the aorist is restricted to perfective verbs, and that hence only those few verbs with both aspects have both of these tenses? That should be mentioned (unless mistaken). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.204.102.111 (talk) 16:13, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Number of patterns

You inflate the number of declension patterns by treating fleeting vowels and predictable orthographical changes as separate declensions, but totally ignore noun animacy and long plural forms. This is very misleading for learners as they would think the particularities as a result of that very pattern instead of animacy or long plurals. Please split the patterns into more categories or reduce the numbers and add notes explaining animacy, long plurals, fleeting vowels and orthographical changes in a clear way. --2001:16B8:311F:5000:4548:E0D3:7A62:EBDB (talk) 17:31, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Animate or inanimate

According to the declension tables bubreg (kidney) would be animate, and sužanj (slave) would be inanimate. Is this really correct?--46.94.137.99 (talk) 11:46, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

They are incorrect; bubreg is inanimate and sužanj is animate (click on "Izvedeni oblici" for the declension). Doremo (talk) 12:28, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]