Wikipedia:WikiProject Linguistics/Assessment
|
|||||||||||||||
|
WikiProject Linguistics |
---|
Task forces |
This is the WikiProject Linguistics assessment summary page. See WP:1.0 and WP:WVWP for more information. For linguistics articles, see Category:Linguistics or Category:Linguistics lists. For linguistics stubs, see Category:Linguistics stubs. For unassessed linguistics articles, see Category:Unassessed Linguistics articles
Instructions
[edit]Quality
[edit]An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Banner Shell}}. Articles that have the {{WikiProject Linguistics}} project banner on their talk page will be added to the appropriate categories by quality.
The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):
FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Linguistics articles) | FA | |
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Linguistics articles) | A | |
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Linguistics articles) | GA | |
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Linguistics articles) | B | |
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Linguistics articles) | C | |
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Linguistics articles) | Start | |
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Linguistics articles) | Stub | |
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Linguistics articles) | FL | |
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Linguistics articles) | List |
For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:
Importance
[edit]An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Linguistics}} project banner on its talk page:
The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):
Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Linguistics articles) | Top | |
High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Linguistics articles) | High | |
Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Linguistics articles) | Mid | |
Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Linguistics articles) | Low | |
NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance Linguistics articles) | NA | |
??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Linguistics articles) | ??? |
article's importance, regardless of its quality.
Importance | Criteria | Example |
---|---|---|
Top | Subject is extremely important, even crucial, to the field of linguistics. Most non-experts will be familiar with the subject. | Grammar |
High | Subject is important to the field of linguistics. Many non-experts will have heard of the subject, but may not be familiar with it. | Morpheme |
Mid | Subject fills out more minor details in linguistics. Non-experts may not have heard of it. | Pseudogapping |
Low | Subject is not particularly important within the field of linguistics, but is still notable. | G cell |