Talk:Scarra
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Scarra article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Scarra" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Contested deletion
[edit]This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (There’re sufficient amount of references and notability of this person.) --DeltaSquad833 (talk) 13:08, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
The language used in the article, clearly does not conform to standards required here on the Wikipedia. Aside from that, the links in the article are poor and don't convey notability. Links like, www.esportsearnings.com and TopTwitchStreamers, are secondary sources that can't be used to provide direct notability as they aren't notable articles written by news agencies as supported for BLPs. Aside from that YouTube links are used in most cases to help with context and dispute solving rather than generating notability, team websites as used here don't generate notability by themselves rather they help with improving notability. The subject of the article isn't notable on his own either, there are many other former pro players, turned streamers who started their own thing, but there's nothing special to prove they require their own standalone articles. The article was severely rushed and uploaded without an adequate AFC review which would have identified these issues, deletion for now is required until a draft is improved. Delta fiver (talk) (UTC) 13:20, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
I've added additional information and references to back up this article. --DeltaSquad833 (talk) 13:57, 15 November 2020
The Eranbot has detected potential copyright violations with the edits you have made. It's best that the information added in is removed, as it encourages the page to get deleted faster because they are issues with copyright material. It's best you remove the information added in good faith as nearly everything is completely plagiarized from here [1] A copyvios test has suspected violation, see here [2] Delta fiver (talk) (UTC) 14:07, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
Rewritten and removed some of the copyright. --DeltaSquad833 (talk) 14:27, 15 November 2020
The copyright material still reads high on the detector. Delta fiver (talk) (UTC) 14:30, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
In that case if possible move it to draft space. DeltaSquad833 (talk) 09:56, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
You have made a great attempt at improving notability, but I too, think it's best to move it back to the draft space as there are still issues with notability, copyright and language. When I move it back, I want it to be submitted to the AFC when ready, please do not move it back to the article space until another reviewer like me has examined the article. Delta fiver (talk) (UTC) 10:07, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Will do, thanks for the help. DeltaSquad833 (talk) 10:15, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
No problem, I'll help with what I can, good luck! Delta fiver (talk) (UTC) 10:16, 16 November 2020 (UTC)