Talk:SWAT: Global Strike Team

SWAT: Global Strike Team was nominated as a Video games good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (January 3, 2021). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (6 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (2 participants)
Dr. Wily (6 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (4 participants)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (6 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (7 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Reception

The reception to SWAT: Global Strike Team should not be described as simply "average," as the 2013 entry does. The game has a Metascore of 69/100, which the site considers "average to mixed." Given the early 2000s release date when scores tended to be higher, and the many tactical shooters released in it's peer group scoring significantly better during that timeframe, I have updated and expanded this section, characterizing the reception as mixed, and citing additional reviews from top sites. Guywelch2000 (talk) 00:18, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]