Jump to content

Talk:Rosa Diaz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk03:10, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Theleekycauldron (talk). Self-nominated at 00:00, 3 December 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Theleekycauldron: Good article! Article is sourced, hooks are interesting, and the QPQ is done. Onegreatjoke (talk) 03:21, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article still seems to be fine. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:45, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Rosa Diaz/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Vortex3427 (talk · contribs) 05:48, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this.

Thanks, @Vortex3427! What's been happening with this review so far? theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/her) 07:06, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I completely forgot about this. I'll start this soon. — VORTEX3427 (Talk!) 07:08, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, starting.
  • Sources are all reliable.
  • created for her instead... Add ref 2 to the end of this sentence. Additionally, ref 1 says that Linetti auditioned for Diaz, not when she was named Megan.
  • with the Chicago Tribune remarking that she was "beyond thrilled". Is the attribution needed here. They're interviewing her in this article; it's safe to assume the information directly came from her.
  • Link first instance of Latina (not as known outside US) and Straight man.
  • She also frequently is shown to have anger management issues; This is directly mentioned in the NY Times source
— VORTEX3427 (Talk!) 07:54, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome! Responses:
  • :)
  • Not sure why ref 2 needs to be added? Also, That's likely just retconning on the part of hollywood.com – Rosa wasn't named Rosa until after Beatriz was cast for the part (Lange 2015).
  • It's pretty flowery, i just cut it in a merge of the two sentences.
  • Linked!
  • I'm hesitant to lay down the personality traits of a character in wikivoice; better to hedge a bit.
theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/her) 23:10, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
1. To support initially created under the name "Megan"...
4. The She also frequently is shown to have anger management issues; is already in the article, but is supported by the GQ source. The NY Times article uses the exact words "anger management".
  • "beating the crap out of the ballerinas" I think this is the exact quote from the show, but the NY Times says instead "beating up the ballerinas"
  • carried emotional Carried more emotional
  • Palmer Haasch with Polygon reported that Rosa's declaration, "I'm bi", was the first time the phrase had been used on network television. Haash also reported that this was not true: This part was... confusing. Reading the article, it says that co-creator Dan Goor was the one who claimed that the phrase was the first time it'd been used on network tv.
  • Link first instance of Chicago Tribune and "first episode" to New Captain
@Theleekycauldron: Anyway, that's it! Sorry for the... two-week long wait. — VORTEX3427 (Talk!) 01:33, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Vortex3427: No worries! I think I've fixed it up now – I'd normally provide the diff, but I'm so tired :) theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/her) 08:21, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Passing now... — VORTEX3427 (Talk!) 01:50, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

to FA

[edit]

Getting this article to FA status will require some sourcing hindsight on Diaz's role on the show, particularly in the first five seasons. I did what I could with the available sourcing, but a lot of it tends to skate over her interactions on the show. In other words, this is basically a summary of sources that already don't do much more than summarize; information on her interactions as a hardass in the first five seasons, in coming out on the show, and in her renewed dating life after that would probably help propel the article the forward. theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/her) 00:52, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Update: past leeky was correct, but somewhat of an idiot for not looking for any academic sources. Here's a few:

  • Espinoza, Maricio (2022). "These are their historias". In Aldama, Frederick Luis (ed.). Latinx TV in the Twenty-First Century. University of Arizona Press. pp. 173–208. ISBN 9780816545018.
  • Putri, Naily Ananda; Primasita, Fitria Akhmerti (April 2024). "The counter-stereotypical representation of Latinas in American police procedural comedy series Brooklyn Nine-Nine (Fox & NBC, 2013–2021)". Rubikon Journal of Transnational American Studies. 11 (1): 16–36.
  • seems reliable, awful translation, can't determine what the citation should even be