Template:Did you know nominations/Rosa Diaz

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 03:10, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Rosa Diaz

(

)

... that the Brooklyn Nine-Nine storyline about Rosa Diaz's bisexuality was heavily influenced by the bisexuality of her her portrayer?
ALT1: ... that Brooklyn Nine-Nine's Rosa Diaz is said to be the opposite of her portrayer, except that they are both bisexual?
ALT2: ... that Stephanie Beatriz dressed similarly to Rosa Diaz until she began playing her on Brooklyn Nine-Nine?
ALT3: ... that the costume of Brooklyn Nine-Nine's Rosa Diaz was influenced by a "robot-cowboy" style?
- Reviewed: Mountain Dew goat commercials
- Comment: still got it :)

Created by Theleekycauldron (talk). Self-nominated at 00:00, 3 December 2022 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Theleekycauldron: Good article! Article is sourced, hooks are interesting, and the QPQ is done. Onegreatjoke (talk) 03:21, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

@Onegreatjoke: thanks so much for the speedy review! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 04:54, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
@Onegreatjoke: would you mind confirming that the article meets guidelines one more time? I've made a significant number of edits since your review and wouldn't want to burden the promoter with re-checking. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 23:32, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Article still seems to be fine. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:45, 4 December 2022 (UTC)