Talk:Rome: Total Realism

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rome: Total Realism article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find video game sources: "Rome: Total Realism" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 15, 2008	Proposed deletion	Kept
August 25, 2011	Articles for deletion	Kept

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (6 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (2 participants)
Dr. Wily (6 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (4 participants)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (6 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (7 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Status of RTR:PE

As of April 7, 2007 it was considered "official" by the designers. "In other news, we are proud to announce that Rome: Total Realism is officially adopting the fan-made modification, Platinum Edition, as an official version of RTR." (http://www.rometotalrealism.org/).

NPOV

This article reads like an advertisement for the mod from a gaming web site, and is not "encyclopedic" in anyway. If someone could take out the FAQ and remove the useless extra commentary and replace with a simple list of changes the mod has over the original game, that would be much more suited. 69.232.225.167

Agreed. I'll work on it. —Simetrical (talk) 04:38, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's much improved now. Some additions to consider: RTR history, and its relationship to IR and MA. —Simetrical (talk) 05:14, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Does anybody know if Total Realism 6.0 works with Rome:Total War 1.5? I've got the Gold edition...--84.217.124.231 21:34, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RTR Gold uses 1.2 edition. Try Platinum which uses 1.5 and is much better than Gold.Lucius Domitius 17:04, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How do you get Platinum? The page this article links to seems kind of out-of-date, and 1.2 isn't on the Total War website anymore.

have you tried via File Sharing apllications? - 80.98.211.195 17:16, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you actually buy rome:total realism or just download it? 'cause on the other page it has a box with the pic on.

pretty sure that box is just a render by someone bored enough to make boxart. 66.215.20.28 (talk) 14:27, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Major Changes

There is scant reference to the changes to the Roman factions. The whole principle of the original game is changed by removing the Senate and the three separate Roman houses to replace them with one single faction. The Senate is no longer able to set objectives which give direction and challenges to the campaign when playing a Roman faction. The intrigue in keeping the Senate sweet whilst courting popularity with the people has gone, and that is a massive reduction in functionality.

It may please the wargamers and the historical pedants, but the mod makes the game one dimensional. I say this as someone who is fascinated with Roman history. However, the makers of t

New Political map

Btw, the page needs a new political map, as the current is from the stone-age 5.3

Yep, I agree. This one is much better. http://lazarus.elte.hu/~hzsolt/terkep/rtw/rtw_political_trm60.png

What about this one? http://lazarus.elte.hu/~hzsolt/terkep/rtw/political_rtr70.png It's unofficial but still illustrates the vastly expanded scope of the upcoming RTR VII —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.85.248.133 (talk) 21:24, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What is the official site?

I do not understand one important thing. Is rometotalwar.org the official site, or is rometotalwar.com the official site. the .com site seems to be

?

Can some one tell me which mod is better Europa Barbarorum or Rome total realism???

Don't download either of them, it is totally unprofessional how they handle installation techniques, they don't warn you about any data loss, they are vague about some program deleting certain files. If you don't understand what they are really saying you are scr*wed. They tell you to simply make a copy of the Data file in your Rome: Total War file, AFTER you have installed the mod. How immature is that? I strongly advice you never to download any of those mods and never ever never install them. Mallerd 22:03, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers for the advice, i posted that message a long time ago in the time after ive tried both mods and i think there brilliant, however i felt EB was the best but it crashed at the year 242BC everytime (very annoying) so now im playing realism and ive got no problems with it. King Alaric 18:54, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've downloaded both EB and XGM and I've never had any problems whatsoever with the installation. SpartanGlory1983 (talk) 13:52, 20 April 2008 (UTC) SpartanGlory1983[reply]

Marius Reforms

Are there any marius reforms in the game i just passed 103BC surly they should have come in around 106 or 107??? I WANT THE COOL LEGIONS lol King Alaric —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.106.81.182 (talk) 19:44, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You need to have an Imperial Palace in two cities in Italy (Rome+other) Kranyak (talk) 21:05, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User Mods

I added this little part and also updated the RTR PE version as well. Xelnanga 04:43, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Notability and focus

I think that this article does conform to the standard of notability required for Wikipedia. I have found several reviews (mostly of the old RTR 6.0 version) online. [1] [2] [3] [4][5] Based on these, I feel that the notability warning should be removed. I am unsure if these would be appropriate for the external links section or not. I also feel that the article focuses on a single version of the mod rather than the project as a whole. I think that future edits of this page should take this into account. --Ptolomy of Epirus (talk) 23:06, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you have found websites establishing notability, please include them in the article and help to clean this page up. There are many gaming review sites that have talked about RTR but nobody has bothered to challenge the notability tag. Someone needs to take the time to do some work on this page. Ace blazer (talk) 16:31, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rome: Total Realism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081021114858/http://pcgamingcenter.ugo.com/?cur=rome-total-war-game-mod to http://pcgamingcenter.ugo.com/?cur=rome-total-war-game-mod

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:09, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

About the recent edits

Most of the content in the article was not sourced and the only plausible explanation for much of it was WP:OR criticism by game users which are certainly not proper reliable sources for the matter. The excruciating details of the additions made by the mod are also not particularly important from the perspective of anyone but users of the mod; for most readers a short and simple summary is more than enough and it fits better with typical content guidelines (for another example of this, see the main article on Rome: Total War; or the very good article on another mod for the same game, Europa Barbarorum). If any new content is to be added; it first and foremost needs proper sources (not just opinions from users of the game). A good start would be for someone to track down the reviews from the various mentioned sources and add that information. 107.190.33.254 (talk) 21:30, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dead Link

The link at the bottom ( http://www.rometotalrealism.org/ ) leads to some blog about video games that does not contain anything about the mod. I assume that the domain owners have changed. I found https://www.moddb.com/mods/rome-total-realism as an alternative, but as I am not sure whether this is official or not, I did not edit the article. Another promising link would be the twcenter forum entry https://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?559467-Rome-Total-Realism-Platinum-Edition-v2-0 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.97.40.174 (talk) 14:17, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]