Talk:Replay review

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (7 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (3 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

OK, just started this page. Concerning notability: replay reviews are extremely prevalent in almost all RTS communities (read article). GRHooked (talk) 18:57, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, my objection to deletion:

Several websites are shown in the article, and I don't even link the Tales of series. It's not advertising.
Replay reviews are prevalent in EVERY RTS game community. Thousands of people are involved with these reviews.
Replay reviews are also used in FPS games and e-sports (Starcraft, DOTA, WC3, Counter Strike). I am going to expand this article to include these.

If you really think it is unworthy, delete it. I am still new. I just think that it is notable enough to slip in above the guidelines. GRHooked (talk) 19:21, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The best thing to do is to provide multiple third-party reviews that discuss the term. Linking to just one website gives the appearance of advertising for that site. TN X Man 19:47, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do link to multiple websites, though. GRHooked (talk) 20:17, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]