Talk:Rage Racer

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was a past project collaboration.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (6 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (2 participants)
Dr. Wily (6 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (4 participants)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (6 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (7 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Vehicle / track tables

Personally I think that these tables are a little too crufty in their current form. I think that we can cover the tracks in prose and the vehicle list isn't really necessary. Any objections? JACO PLANE • 2007-05-17 12:00

(Confession : I added those tables)

Certainly agree regarding the track table, as there's so few of them. On the vehicles table, when I realised there were only a dozen or so cars, I thought a table wouldn't be too crufty. Looking back, I've since spotted the List_of_cars_in_the_Ridge_Racer_series article, so perhaps the article should just point to that instead? --Oscarthecat 16:25, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed on both points, tracks could be discussed in gameplay and the existing list of RR cars covers that base too. QuagmireDog 00:41, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, now done. --Oscarthecat 18:16, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:RageRacerBox.jpg

Image:RageRacerBox.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:29, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]