Talk:Project Space Station

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (7 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (3 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Biased article

I stumbled across this article with Special:Random, and decided it seems to have too much of one person's opinion about the game scattered through the article. It really needs rewriting right the way through to make it seem more like an article in an encyclopedia and not a review. I haven't got time to do this now, but I may do it in the next few days if noone else does it first. Markdarb 10:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, too much personal feelings about game play. It was a game, not a real-time simulator. Talk about the aspects of the game, or the designer. No room for complaints in an encyclopedia.

Two years and still no changes, lol. Can someone with knowledge of the topic re-write? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.103.102.255 (talk) 07:43, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I should've said that I resolved the problem by completely rewriting the article in 2009. If someone feels the new article's still biased, please definitely bring it up. -- Burton Radons (talk) 02:32, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]