Talk:Planet Coaster

Planet Coaster was nominated as a Video games good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (January 23, 2017). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Amusement Parks: Roller Coasters Bottom‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles
Bottom	This article has been rated as Bottom-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Roller Coasters task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Video games Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Jackpot World (0 participants)
Bejeweled Stars (3 participants)
Melee (game terminology) (2 participants)
Solo leveling: Unlimited (3 participants)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Araya (video game) (3 participants; relisted)
Chao (Sonic the Hedgehog) (8 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (11 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Planet Coaster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://frontier.co.uk/investor_relations/reports/news/?artid=525&pageNum=0&blk=275

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:12, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mac release?

I understand this IP is trying to add the fact that the game was not released on macOS, however, I can't find a source anywhere that says this; even using Google doesn't help. At this point, is it best that we keep reverting the IP and warning them until it comes time to report them to AIV or another noticeboard? jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 20:12, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is obviously the individual's own opinion as they claim that "most people agree the creators have shot themselves in the foot" of which the prior is unspecificed (who is "most people"), and the latter unsourced jargon, refered to the "lack of a Mac release" as part of critics' opinions, which is also unsourced, and then adding unsourced sales numbers (that also seem unlikely). It is evident that the user intents to talk about his frustration over/his wish on the release or not-release of the game on macOS without reason, rationale, or source and is clearly WP:NOTHERE. For the matter of discussion content, our coustom search engine returns zero results on the matter that stem from professionals, only occasionally (sparsely) comments saying "Mac? Linux?" or "I wish this was on my system", neither of which is anyhow applicable. For now, we should look for warnings on edit warring and/or unsourced additions or personal opinions (that's three things you can report them on!), and if their vandalism exceeds further than their fourth warning, AIV should be notified. Lordtobi (✉) 17:33, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Release section

It doesn't seem to me that this section is too short for the subject. There's not much to add, at least that I can find. I suggest removing the tag, but maybe there's something I'm missing. Bruzer Fox 19:53, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AMiRALi

357 2003:C6:173E:EA00:5C18:AA12:F26D:B5D8 (talk) 07:17, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]