Talk:PeaceMaker

This article was nominated for deletion on 2006 July 9. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants)
Purple Francis (8 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (3 participants)
Dr. Wily (9 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

copyvio

this page was essentially an unaltered copy of the game website, [1], so i deleted it and replaced it with a stub. It needs some work . . . --he ah 02:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How is this "article" anything but a free advertisement for this game?

In reality, how is any article little but an advertisement for what is being described? Be it a game, a car, or a religion. Mushrom 17:29, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links

What do you think about removing the next two links from the article?

Thomas Barnett blog on PeaceMaker - Also it has PeaceMaker in the title, the article talk about something else.
Game Developers Conference 2005 - does not hold any valuable information

Mark Matusevich (talk) 17:41, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Simulator?

Is the statement that the game simulates the conflict appropriate? At best, the game simulates political views on the conflict of its creators and sponsors. Saying that it "simulates", creates an impression that the consequences of your decisions in the game will be some how close to their consequences in the real world. Or at least, they will be close to what scientific consensus says it will be. But as the conflict is a political issue, there is no any consensus. Mark Matusevich (talk) 18:26, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Educational video games category

The game should not be in "educational video games" category. Propaganda is not an education after all! What do you think? Mark Matusevich (talk) 18:26, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it teaches people about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and it has no bias. Israel may be able to attack Palestine, but in the real world as well, Palestine is weaker. 62.31.242.55 (talk) 15:45, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is clear about its political position, and is educational in teaching the different challenges confronting Israeli and Palestinian leaders. Tedperl (talk) 18:22, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]