Talk:Paws and Claws: Pet Vet

Apps Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of apps on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AppsWikipedia:WikiProject AppsTemplate:WikiProject Appsapps articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Contribute to the project:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Good article nominations : Improve Application software, Facebook and Instagram to good article status
Stubs : Category:Mobile game stubs, Category:Stub-Class apps articles

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (7 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (3 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Untitled

This page is a very condensed, unfinished stub. Can someone help? Please?

Abluescarab 06:01, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:VG assessment

Response to assessment request. I've rated the article as stub class, as that's all it could be rated as currently. At this stage adding a list of suggestions doesn't seem appropriate as there's several tags outlining the main problem already on the article. The main concern is that the game isn't clearly identified as a commercial game, this review is an example of the articles which could be used to expand the stub. I'll try to fix the article some, if you'd like further guidance please consult the templates on the article or resubmit for further assessment. Someone another (talk) 09:07, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've made a start. If anyone is interested in expanding the article further and is unsure of what to do, consult the video game project's article guidelines, if further help is needed feel free to drop me a line on my talk page. Someone another (talk) 10:05, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]