Talk:Parrotia persica
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 30 August 2019
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved — Amakuru (talk) 16:35, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Parrotia → Parrotia persica – No longer monotypic with the discovery of a fossil species and a new species in China. Parrotia persica is the type species and most of the article is about it. A check of the article history shows an awareness that it is no longer monotypic. Abductive (reasoning) 05:57, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Move - the article seems mostly about Parrotia persica and there is now Parrotia brevipetiolata, Parrotia grandidentata, Parrotia subaequalis, and
Parrotia jacquemontiana. --Nessie (talk) 11:38, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Support page history should be associated with Parrotia persica with a new article started for the genus. Plantdrew (talk) 16:04, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.