Talk:Pardus (video game)

article material

feel free to add information on program language used. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 19:17, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Article name

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

• Pardus_(computer_game) is a Browser_game not a Video_game, or a Computer_game.
  • "Pardus is a graphic-based Massive Multiplayer Online Browser Game"
  • Request "Pardus_(browser_game)" name exception from WP:CVG per WP:ASTONISH.
• Pardus disambiguation is per MOS:DAB
  • Pardus_(operating_system)
  • Panthera pardus
  • Pardus_(computer_game)
• WP:CVG List of Free MMOGs
• WP:CVG (video_game)
  • Habitat_(video_game) is a C64 game
  • Huxley_(video_game) is an XBox game
• WP:CVG (computer_game)
  • Pardus_(computer_game) to Pardus_(browser_game)
  • Dark_Ages_(computer_game)
  • Aces_High_(computer_game)
  • Crossfire_(computer_game)
  • Diaspora_(computer_game)
  • Lineage_(computer_game)
  • PlaneShift_(computer_game)
  • QuizQuiz_(computer_game)
  • SubSpace_(computer_game)
  • Tibia_(computer_game)
  • Aion_(computer_game)

LantzR (talk) 22:16, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Makes sense to call it a browser game in the title. --TheSeer (TalkˑContribs) 23:03, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

• Support Pardus (browser game). --Joshua Issac (talk) 23:24, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Page moved to Pardus (browser game). Fixed double redirects. -- LantzR (talk) 09:52, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Assessment

I think this article is still Start-class material. While there is quite a lot of detail, this detail creeps into WP:GAMEGUIDE. The article seems to be written by fans instead of un-biased editors. The overall layout of the article is wrong, and is missing things like "Development". Like you said, much of the article is sourced by the official website, which is an ok source, but shouldn't be the main source. Some of the content on this page should be added to a section called "Reception", which shows how the critics liked the game. Also, use the WP:VG search engine to look for good sources to reference the article. I rate this Start instead of C because if all of the cruft was taken out of the article, that is what it would be. Thanks, _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 18:41, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Controversies with the game

It is slightly weird that the article does not mention any of the game controversies. There have been substantial turnovers of players due to the behaviour of the devs. Heck of a time avoiding first-person accounts to get this information, I know, but it has been a (very) long-standing issue with the game. NathanZook (talk) 07:53, 25 October 2018 (UTC)