Talk:Pandemonium 2

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Gilman Louie (1 participant)
Yoshimitsu (1 participant)
Dr. Wily (2 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (2 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (4 participants)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (6 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (7 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Untitled

Whilst this is by no means fully polished all the information was sourced via the game manual, so it just needs a little more work. I'll try to put more effort into it in the mean time. Piecraft 17:57, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I think the character descriptions need to be reworded to be more encyclopedic.

Does it really say Nikki is a "curvaceously dangerous prostitute" in the manual? So when I rented this game, I was playing as a prostitute and was totally unaware of it?--69.153.246.244 07:58, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

European version

The PC version of this game was released in Europe around the same time it was released in US. Anyone can confirm that? --213.230.129.24 (talk) 14:56, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About the "Reception" section of this article...

So let me get this straight: the editor thought it was a good idea at reviewing the game on a section that is supposed to capture the overall reception the game got when it was released, complete with a table of a ratings score from various video game journalism games on side of it. Not only does this contradict the "neutral point-of-view" approach of Wikipedia, it is also out of place to have such a "review" dominate the whole section because this kind of style just doesn't fit. Does anyone here think that the "Reception" section should be rewritten to meet the Wikipedia standards? 189.124.168.175 (talk) 01:33, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It seems whoever added it just copied and pasted the entire GameSpot review. I've cleaned the section up. Moozipan Cheese (talk) 12:19, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Source