Talk:PUBG: Battlegrounds/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Shorten Article

The article is too big and clunky. Too many unnecessary stuff. DAVRONOVA.A. ✉ ⚑ 16:11, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Would you mind outline why and how this fairly well-structured article is "too big and clunky", and which elements you consider unnecessary? Lordtobi (✉) 16:56, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Given the impact this game has had on the industry, this is probably the right size for this article. --Masem (t) 17:01, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Could you explain what's unnecessary to you? Like any large article, there could be a small cleanup that removes any redundant and overall detailed information, but other than that, it's comparable to other games that have had a large impact on the industry, like Final Fantasy VII and Dota 2. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 18:46, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

@Lordtobi, Masem, and Dissident93: Ok guys let me share some of my feedback here:

1. Second paragraph of the introduction section contains too much unnecessary information on release. The "best-seller" and "millions of players" in the first lines sounds like intentional advertisement placed well beyond necessity.
   The number of copies sold may suit way better I think.

• The lead you mean? If so, it could be condensed a bit, but including that it sold 50 million, which makes it one of the best selling games of all time, is a notable achievement and therefore should be kept. However, I do kind of agree that the Steam peak number count seems a bit strange in the section, even if it's notable. Perhaps merging it with the copies sold would make it read better? ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 18:23, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

1. Windows paragraph of release section explains that the early players were top-streaming twitch users. It's ok but it can be described much shorter and somewhere else. Currently it takes about a half of the paragraph and describes early access which hardly corresponds to release itself, rather it is a pre-release adjustment of the game and probably should be shortened and moved into development section.

• I provided some fixes, but early access was a part of its overall release scheduling. I don't think it would be better off moved to another section. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 18:23, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

1. Problems with latency for Chinese players playing on European/American servers can be described much shorter. The The large Chinese player base had led to some technical and community problems with the game. - completely unnecessary. Specific problems already described below and they also can be shortened.

• Removed a number of sentences that explained too much detail. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 18:23, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

1. Other platforms — a lot of unimportant details about possibilities of releasing on Sony Play Station meanwhile nothing about →Android version.

• Android/mobile info is listed there, check again. But yes, the PlayStation 4 version section is a bit bloated and shouldn't have so much redundant info. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 18:23, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

1. Reception — detailed speculations of journalists about game performance after release. Can be shortened.

I also have to say even though the article is somewhat bloated it is rather difficult to read rather than big in terms of size.

Recently I have compared it to the BioShock Infinite and learned that this one is much smaller that the latter one lol. So may be I'm being wrong. DAVRONOVA.A. ✉ ⚑ 19:21, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 31 October 2018

02:22, 31 October 2018 (UTC)issues: in the new update there is lot of new things like new clothes,shoes,masks,guns so that is why it is a big update

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. -- ferret (talk) 02:36, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 31 October 2018

02:30, 31 October 2018 (UTC)issues: In the new update there is lot of new things like new clothes,shoes,masks,guns so that is why it is a big update so some bugs are there which should be removed by the game immediately.The new night is also there but many people say that when they play the game they do not get to see night mode so that is an issue,and there is a bug or something but there is a gun which is not introduced in the update but it is there in the game so the people are confused and angry about that situation.

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. -- ferret (talk) 02:36, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

And likely WP:NOTCHANGELOG / WP:VGSCOPE applies even if sources do cover it. At best it would be a combined sentence or two in development to mention all the larger updates. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 10:23, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

We should only add update info like this if they changed a major aspect of the game or if it introduced something notable. More cosmetics/guns doesn't fall into this. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 17:39, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Caution on PS4 port

While stories like this read as if PS4 is 100% confirmed, they really are not. We need to wait until a true announcement. --Masem (t) 14:43, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

And now , we have confirmation. --Masem (t) 16:14, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Maps List

Will it be appropriate to create a section to describe the different maps in the game and the features/stories behind each one? --Ramitau (talk) 01:25, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Yes, actually, that would be fair. There's.. 3 maps now? I know there's fairly reasonable statements from Greene/PUBG on the approach they were taking to maps. --Masem (t) 01:28, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Yeah, they just announced a new one at the TGAs; Dave Curd, the world art director for PUBG Corp, was also there to talk about it. Lordtobi (✉) 07:18, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

The history and reception of each? Yes. Gameguide-y detail about them? No. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 08:10, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Definitely not in a gameguide-y way. There are currently 3 Maps, each has different characteristics of area size, landscape features and available arms. While fictional, they are heavily influenced by real life areas (there are videos online about the process of making each one and the teams actually used pictures from different places in the creation of buildings and terrain).

• Erangel
• Miramar
• Sanhok
• Vivendi

--Ramitau (talk) 10:45, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Right, I'm just saying that we should keep it to real-world impact only and not mention that a map has a popular spot on it where players like to gather and such. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 21:13, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

to which section of the article you think this should go into? Ramitau (talk) 11:51, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

"Development" if you're discussing design or planning or historical iteration, "Gameplay" is you're discussing gameplay or features, or "Reception" if you're discussing reviews and real-world impact. Or any combination. I mean, it really depends on what exactly the sources are talking about? —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 13:06, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Capitalize the title

As PlayerUnknown stated in an interview, the title should be all caps:

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

Leduyquang03 on 8h42 | 7/1/2019 UTC. —Preceding undated comment added 08:43, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

"As a designer, I think it just looks better in all-caps."

MOS:CAPS + stylistic decision rather than acronym → no all-caps. Lordtobi (✉) 10:35, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Specifically MOS:TMCAPS, which states editors should "use the style that most closely resembles standard English text formatting and capitalization rules", which would be proper case. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 18:04, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 9 January 2019

Here it says that PUBG maps are generally in 8x8. This is wrong, since a new 6x6 map has been introduced and there is also a4x4 map in PUBG. pls change this into the maps are generally in 8x8, 6x6 and 4x4. 1.36.10.55 (talk) 09:25, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. – Jonesey95 (talk) 11:54, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

I added a mention and a source. I wonder what the best way to mention the size is though, as now it lists all three variations. We do in fact have enough reliable sources that discuss each map in details, so it might make sense to include a sentence or two on each. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 12:29, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Mapsize is WP:GAMECRUFT to me, even if sourced. At most, just have a general statement saying "maps range in size from 4x4 to 8x8" and never mention it again. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 02:48, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Well if you watch youtube youll know. h — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.36.10.55 (talk) 11:20, 10 January 2019 (UTC) To be more accurate the 6x6 can be found in Vikendi EP1 House Sets on the PUBG channel, and the 4x4 for Sanhok can be found on Gamepedia and Fandom. P.S.I also suggest that it should be stated that other than random airdrops, a super airdrop containing more loot can be summoned with a flare gun. Another thing I realised that was wrong is instead of random red zones as said here, red zones are possibly used to drive out potential campers, as said on Gamepedia. Also, the Training Island(Camp Jackal) should also be included, since it is a part of PUBG. The proof is on Gamepedia and the trailers in PUBG's official channel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.36.10.55 (talk) 11:33, 10 January 2019 (UTC) It's just that PUBG players such as me may feel unjustified since map size is a key factor to strategies. You should also included the way a game should be played for each map: long,sophiscated battles in the 8x8 Erangel where strategies are the key, sniping and camping battles in Miramar where there are tons of mountains, guerilla and intensive battles in 4x4 Sanhok where firepower is the key, and quick-loot and evasive battles in the snow-covered Vikendi where camoflauge is a key to survival. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.36.10.55 (talk) 11:52, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

1.36.10.55 (talk) 12:17, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

 Not done You didn't understand Dissident's response. It's not that we don't believe you. The sources for the information you provide (Fandom, gamepedia, youtube, etc) are unreliable for use on Wikipedia, but that isn't the issue. The issue is its viewed as trivial gamecruft. It belongs on sites like Gamepedia and Fandom, not Wikipedia. See WP:VGSCOPE for a deeper understanding of the kinds of content we avoid on Wikipedia for video games. -- ferret (talk) 12:58, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

To argue the other side though, why are we not including any information about maps because we deem it gamecruft even though there a good dozen of sources describing each map? After all, WP:DUE asks we include major viewpoints and sources discussing PUBG gameplay is the current bandwagon. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 13:53, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

WP:GAMECRUFT doesn't necessarily mean everything there should be avoided; it's more about how encyclopedic the information actually is and the way it gets presented. For example, the guideline says to avoid having cast lists/tables (even when notable) and instead write their involvement in prose. Thus, I think it's better to have a single large paragraph (or two) dedicated to the maps in general instead of each specific map receiving its own small paragraph, which is simply more likely by default to include things such as their meta and strategies and other actual gamecruft stuff that the above user brought up. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 20:35, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Article too long

Per guidance at WP:TOOBIG: an article bigger than 60 kB "probably should be divided"; over 100 kB "almost certainly should be divided". This article is 147 KB, as I write this. I posted a {{Very long}} template on the article which was reverted by User:Dissident93. Some things that could be done to make it more readable are:

• Remove redundant references, per WP:TOOMANYREFS. None of the statements in the article warrants two references. E.g. "the early access version for the Xbox One was released on December 12, 2017 in both digital and physical formats" is this so controversial it needs three refs?
• The info in the awards section is provided twice, once as prose and once as a table, and ref'd both times.
• Too much detail in the Development, Release, and Reception sections.
• Sales info could just be in a table rather than prose.

--Cornellier (talk) 13:36, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Readable prose is only 42k, well within allowed PAGESIZE. Additionally, given the importance of this game to the vector that the market took (eg battle royale games and Fortnite), the Dev, Release, and Reception sections are probably exactly where they should be. We avoid sales as tables as this encourages the use of bad sourcing (VGChartz and Steam Spy directly). Refs aren't counted towards prose. --Masem (t) 14:45, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Seconding on all points. Mainly that TOOBIG discusses prose size. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 14:56, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

However, I do agree that we should do something about the awards section. If it's repeated in prose, then it does not need to belong in the table (which is where a lot of the article size is coming from). This is an issue many articles share. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 17:19, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for the feedback. BTW please use colons for indent, asterixes for bullets (fixed). So agreement (or not disagreement?) on WP:TOOMANYREFS? Nobody mentioned that. As for the length, aside from the numbers, I still think that the article has too much detail about history e.g. "Kim contacted and offered him the opportunity to work on a new battle royale concept. Within a week, Greene flew out to Bluehole's headquarters in Korea to discuss the options" is getting seriously bogged down in the nitty-gritty. I'm thinking the article could look more like Fortnite. --Cornellier (talk) 20:52, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

WP:TOOMANYREFS doesn't apply here. It's mainly focused on refbombing and cluttered individual sentences with multiple in-line citations. All citations in this article appear to be properly placed and no statements have more than 3. While some trimming might be possible, there's no actual issue here. Secondary to that, it's an essay, not a guideline. -- ferret (talk) 22:04, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

WP:TOOMANYREFS may be an essay but it's also common sense. Its first line is " adding too many [refs] can cause citation clutter, making articles look untidy in read mode and difficult to navigate in markup edit mode". That's we have in this article. Can anyone give a reason why the phrase "the early access version for the Xbox One was released on December 12, 2017 in both digital and physical formats" has three refs, when one is enough? It's very arguably WP:GAMECRUFT anyway. --Cornellier (talk) 22:31, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

I agree that that sentence does not need three refs. I don't see it as a urgent problem but if anyone else does I don't see why they can't go ahead and remove at least one, this isn't a contested point and is unlikely to be challenged.

The other area I could see being cleaned up would be the awards section, I don't see the point in having prose and a table, one or the other is sufficient and the table is far more readable.

That being said I do not feel the article is too long, it seems about right. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:48, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

The multiple refs are likely (best that I can recall) from when we had extra information that each ref uniquely supported but then cut back on some text, so that all used refs remained. Partially my doing at least with trimming and leaving the refs behind (safe than sorry). But again, keep in mind refs don't count towards page size. --Masem (t) 00:26, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the info User:Masem. Sifting through refs is a pain. Guys, apologies for barging in here without first reading the talk page. I now see that length was discussed not so long ago. This is a high-quality article, a lot of thought and work has obviously gone into it. User:Beeblebrox on a personal note, I'm a player of PUBG (Windows). Was checking the article on the train on my phone ... you don't "see it as an urgent problem" but I'm sorry, it was just not fun to read. So much flicking through historical stuff. Tiny data sample I'll admit, but my experience FWIW. I'd like to have been able to read the whole article in about 10 minutes, but that's not possible, so a lot of jumping around and scrolling is required. --Cornellier (talk) 03:56, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

This article is not written with the reader in mind. It is written by people intent on showing how much they know about the game. It ought to be shortened by 3/5 or so in order to be readable. However it is semi-protected (likely by the same kind of person) so no one sane can help do this. Consider why people would read a wikipedia article about a game before writing a wikipedia article about a game. Thanks Gnostc (talk) 19:37, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

The article is currently at 44kb of readable prose, which per SIZE is fine. Keeping in mind that this is the key defining game of the battle royale genre, it got a huge amount of attention and thus most of coverage is on its reception. --Masem (t) 19:53, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

The introduction provides most of the info that people are looking for. The gameplay section is far too detailed. I was under the impression that Wikipedia was for readers. The development and reception sections are far too dense with too many unnecessary details. The information I came to the page for isn't even in the article (Miramar map release date). It isn't even mentioned. There is no e-sports section. There is no significant patch changes section, especially changes from alpha to release. The article needs to be unlocked and re-done. It is uninteresting and overwrought as-is. Gnostc (talk) 10:41, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

The stuff you seem to want is stuff that as a general encyclopedia we don't cover: We aren't going to cover patch information or specific dates of releases of new maps. Instead, we're coming at this article as if the reader is not a video game player, but needs to learn how this became a significantly important game and geared to that, not to the player who knows how to play and wants the changes (that's where gaming wikis are for). And there's a top level esports section, that's not missing at all. --Masem (t) 13:22, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

I don't see how this page is written with a non-video game player in mind, for that, they would need to understand the evolution of first-person shooters from Doom/Quake to Counterstrike/other "realistic" shooters as well as the evolution of graphics technology allowing for huge maps, as was seen first in the GTA games. None of that is explained in the article even in a sentence, so it couldn't possibly be for a new video game player. I can't for the life of me figure out who the audience for this page is. PC gamers that have never heard of Battle Royale games or PUBG? Like you just said, that would be for a niche gaming wiki.

All it seems to me is as an information dump for people who want to show how much they know about the game without regard for any context. It's too bad there aren't satisfaction surveys for individual pages, so all the people who don't sperg out in comment sections and in edits can vote on how satisifed they are with the page as-is. No attempt is made on this page to centrally "place the game within history", which seems to me the best function of an online public encyclopedia, past any information it provides for research attempts. And if it is, it's all buried in the article.

Why is PUBG important? Why is/was it so popular? How was it first in what it did? What made it possible? And so on. Not even attempted. It's an information-dump, as-is, without much attempt to tie it all together. It's unreadable, I almost guarantee no one actually reads this page besides the editors. That could change. Gnostc (talk) 00:37, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Requested move 17 March 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: consensus not to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 05:19, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

---

PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds → PUBG – See below for rationale. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:51, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Google "PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds": 26,800,000 results. Google PUBG: 230,000,000 results. Per WP:COMMONNAME this article should be called PUBG. Also instances of "Battlegrounds" in the article should be replaced with "PUBG". Examples of usage: PUBG Corporation, PUBG Mobile, YouTube, most of the articles cited, etc. --Cornellier (talk) 15:19, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Cornellier, Google is not representative because it does not just list what we consider reliable sources. PUBG is the shorthand, PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS (wikipedified as PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds) is the official full name. Both versions satisfy WP:COMMONNAME, so we go by WP:OFFICIALNAME. Regards. Lordtobi (✉) 15:51, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

You're saying the fact that PUBG gets an order of magnitude more hits than "PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds" is irrelevant. Fine. Google was one example of many. Twitch streamers called it PUBG. YouTubers call it PUBG. It's called PUBG on Reddit. Fact is, the game is commonly called PUBG. It's WP:COMMONSENSE. --Cornellier (talk) 16:28, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

We have to remember that PUBG is an initialism, so it not a name (save for the copropration). --Masem (t) 16:38, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Irrelevant per WP:UCRN. It's FIFA and not Fédération Internationale de Football Association. Volkswagen Beetle, not Volkswagen Type 1. PUBG Mobile. PUBG Corp. at pubg.com. National PUBG League. PUBG Europe League. I'm gonna go play some PUBG, during which time I suggest people spend some time at Reddit / YouTube / Twitch and find out how people talk and write about this IRL. --Cornellier (talk) 17:23, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia is for general readers, not the gaming insiders. The initialisms are used by those familiar with the subject. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, World of Warcraft, Defense of the Ancients, League of Legends, etc. It is indeed irrelevant what Reddit, YouTube or Twitch users call it because we go by reliable sources that call the games by official name and then abbreviate for readability. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 17:46, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

FIFA and NASA have decades of usages to be able to judge. This game is barely two years old. Maybe in five years? It's far too soon to decide that PUBG is the common name. --Masem (t) 18:34, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

I guess I can see both sides of this argument. I agree we aren't writing for gaming insiders, but I can also see the argument that it is routinely referred to as PUBG all over the place. I don't think this is a matter of dueling policies as I don't see either "trumping" the other one.Upon further examination, COMMONNAME quite clearly does "trump" OFFICIALNAME. I also do belive that for naming decisions Google hits are in fact a halfway decent metric. I think what we need here is more evidence one way or the other and maybe a formal WP:RM so that the broader community will be aware of the discussion. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:21, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

• Oppose Keep official name. PUBG redirects here anyways, so no one is going to be lost. -- ferret (talk) 20:12, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
• I've gone ahead and made this an official RM and notified the video games WikiProject of this discussion, I think this discussion would benefit from some previously uninvolved input. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:51, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
• Oppose per ferret. We usually keep the full name over abbreviations, even when they are more common (like NHL, NBA, NFL). ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 04:41, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
• Oppose If we know the full title over an abbreviation, we use it (Call of Duty over CoD; Counter-Strike: Global Offensive over CS:GO, League of Legends over LoL, etc.) And this is younger than any of those examples. As long as PUBG is redirected, and the initialism established in the lede, we're fine. --Masem (t) 06:07, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
• Oppose per above. Lordtobi (✉) 09:25, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
• Oppose per my above comment. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 11:02, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
• Support per WP:COMMONNAME. PUBG is a game made by PUBG Corp at pubg.com. It has a spinoff called PUBG Mobile. You can discuss it at the PUBG subreddit or on many of the PUBG content creators on YouTube.--Cornellier (talk) 13:23, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

The URL is a bad example, the original URL (held for several years) was "PlayBattlegrounds.com". Content creators and especially Reddit or not reliable, so as I already stated, we don't take those into the equation. Lordtobi (✉) 12:43, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Google pubg site:forbes.com 732 hits; "PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds" site:forbes.com 195 hits. How about this at Business Insider "... Players, tired of saying/typing such a long and bizarre name, have taken to calling it 'PUBG'..." Or this at Vice "PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds has a tongue-twister of a name that is unnatural to say and a pain to type out. This has led its players to shorten it to a simple acronym: PUBG." What more is needed to take "into the equation"? --Cornellier (talk) 14:08, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Again, abbreviations are usually one of the exceptions to WP:COMMONNAME, so PUBG needs another valid policy-based reason to become the article title. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 16:23, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Dissident93, the examples NHL, NBA, NFL and initialisms, and not analogous. WP:COMMONNAME says "Abbreviations and acronyms are often ambiguous and thus should be avoided unless the subject is known primarily by its abbreviation and that abbreviation is primarily associated with the subject (e.g. PBS, NATO, Laser)". In this case there's no ambiguity as stated at Acronym Finder and at abbreviations.com, and "primarily associated" is demonstrated above. So WP:COMMONNAME is a "valid policy-based reason". --Cornellier (talk) 22:53, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

I'll stress what I've said above: every example like this or FIFA or NASA has decades of evidence to recognize that that is how those agencies are commonly called. WP avoids neologisms, and asking us to say that a 2-year old game should be called something different falls into that. --Masem (t)

• Oppose - a short abbreviation like this does not generally aid the reader in recognizability. Sergecross73 msg me 14:34, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

How about keeping both?

I think PUBG is better than the full name but keeping it like PUBG( PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds) would be great. skyleet 13:51, 22 March 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skysunil (talk • contribs)

No one is proposing that the redirect PUBG be deleted. Both will remain regardless of which is the primary. -- ferret (talk) 13:53, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

One of the major reasons WP:REDIRECTs exist to keep us from using confusing hybrid names like this. Sergecross73 msg me 15:10, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 19 April 2019

In April 2019, Iraq banned both PUBG and Fortnite, due to the "negative effect" of these games on the youth. 176.198.200.136 (talk) 07:49, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

 Done ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 16:09, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 7 May 2019

Could you add the fact that a new Chinese mobile version for PUBG which roughly translates to "Lost Island Operation" has been published and is in testing mode? 119.236.11.97 (talk) 10:56, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. – Jonesey95 (talk) 11:23, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

I cannot find any sources for this. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 11:46, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 7 May 2019

Hi! I'm requesting two changes to this article. The first thing is the fact that regular care packages do not require the use of flare guns. Instead, planes will fly over the map regularly and drop a package randomly. A flare gun, though, can summon a super airdrop with double the loot or an armoured car if fired outside of the safe zone. The flare will travel for about 200 metres before coming to a stop in the air, allowing all players to see it. While the armoured car has no features to alert players to its presence, the super care package emits yellow smoke visible to everyone. So you should change the bit about care packages to something like this. I know this is what you call "Gamecruft", but I guess this should be added, or at least a simplified version. The second thing is that I think you should make Mobile a separate pages, due to some content, gameplay and graphic differences. Thank you for your attention! 119.236.11.97 (talk) 11:59, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

• I can't speak on the first suggestion since I don't play the game, but a dedicated PUBG Mobile page has the potential to be created. Somebody could start a draft and see where it goes. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 16:33, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. As for the second idea, feel free to write a second article, and at that point the content would be removed from here. DannyS712 (talk) 22:42, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Caution on addiction

Update request for news update "Hyderabad Boy Suffers a Stroke After Playing PUBG for Hours at a Stretch" https://www.news18.com/news/buzz/hyderabad-boy-suffers-from-stroke-after-playing-pubg-for-hours-at-a-stretch-2295809.html Amitized (talk) 13:21, 4 September 2019 (UTC)Amitized

Vice source. I think this might be more related to video game addiction overall, not just PUBG. Lordtobi (✉) 13:28, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Fromt he news 18 story: "countless incidents have been reported where individuals have died from playing PUBG too much." As we say on Wikipedia, . Beeblebrox (talk) 19:46, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

News18 is not a reliable sources, but Vice is. It is not the first case of severe medical conditions resulting from playing PUBG, as Vice reports, but I believe that this is not exclusive to PUBG. Lordtobi (✉) 20:07, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Who told News 18 is not reliable source? It is reliable source in India. PUBG addiction has caused deaths, due to is violent content, which should be mentioned in this article, to give correct picture. Donot overprotect the firm which released PUBG. Rayabhari (talk) 05:59, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

I don't think a single death (of which PUBG itself is the dubious cause) should be pointed out here, unless merged into already existing content. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 15:20, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Still feel stating it in a generic way may serve as caution for curious readers who may come to read about the game before they start playing Amitized (talk) 07:53, 12 September 2019 (UTC)Amitized

If it's kept to a brief mention, ideally merging into an existing sentence, then I have no issue with it. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 16:27, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Vice is at least a better source, News18 is obviously biased on this issue and doing some very shoddy reporting. However, I also think this is more about video game addiction in general. Fortnite works by essentially the same rules and is played even more by younger gamers so I'm curious as to why PUBG is being singled out. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:39, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Payload mode

Addition of the new release of payload mode for season 9 that will include helicopters and rocket launchers [1]

Amitized (talk) 07:57, 12 September 2019 (UTC)Amitized

• Is this notable? We don't need to document every single update that adds a new weapon. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 16:23, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Peacekeeper Elite

Peacekeeper Elite is the Chinese mainland version of PUBG Mobile. It surpassed US$1bil (RM4.33bil) in revenue in 2019. [2]

Peacekeeper Elite, Tencent’s replacement title for PUBG Mobile in China, currently has over 50 million daily active users and has grossed an estimated $600 million (¥4.2 billion) in H1 2019. [3]

So I think Peacekeeper Elite should have a section or at least it should be mentioned inside the article. Avram25 (talk) 18:37, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 13 May 2020

change image from "PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds Steam Logo.jpg" to "PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUND Logo.svg" Haideronwiki (talk) 11:32, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

 Not done. The image is of significantly lower quality and doesn't spell the game name correctly. IceWelder [✉] 11:56, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 18 June 2020

Sir PubG is now owned by Tencent which is from China. But wiki shows it is korean. Pls clarify 150.129.166.119 (talk) 06:02, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Jack Frost (talk) 10:49, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

PUBG COMPUTERIZED VERSION IS SOUTH KOREAN BUT MOBILE VERSION IS CHINESE!!

Many people are not aware that PUBG mobile version was launched by TENCENT GAMES WHICH IS A CHINESE GAMING COMPANY..People are thinking that PUBG fully is a South Korean game but they don't know PUBG's mobile version was launched by TENCENT GAMES which is Chinese... So PUBG can't be said fully SOUTH KOREAN..

So I request to the dear editors that Please change the headline that PUBG is SOUTH KOREAN and show the full details of PUBG's MOBILE VERSION when ever people will search about PUBG and it's country. Please do the needful editings as soon as possible..

Thank you, Krishnangshu Taladhi 182.66.4.119 (talk) 04:53, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

 DoneThe article clearly identifies the mobile versions as being developed and released by Tencent. --Masem (t) 05:23, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 21 June 2020

Change the cover art from the small Steam page logo to the higher quality image available here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds.jpg. CSS image cropping can be done to this image (taking a 2160 x 2880 crop from the center of the image) to covert it into the game cover with the 3:4 ratio. Shivang P Swain 11:52, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

 Not done We cannot use high-resolution images of copyrighted media, see WP:NFC. --Masem (t) 14:45, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Pubg Unban In Pakistan

On the Reception section please add this line On 30 July 2020 A meeting was held between PTA and legal representatives of Proxima Beta Pte Ltd (PB). PTA expressed its satisfaction on measures adopted by Proxima Beta Pte Ltd (PB) so far and emphasized on continued engagement and a comprehensive control mechanism. Keeping in view the positive engagement & response of the company, PTA decided to unban PUBG. after the line saying that PUBG was banned by PTA on 1 July 2020...However the ban is temporary till further orders from the court

Source: https://tribune.com.pk/story/2257427/pta-lifts-ban-on-pubg-bigo-after-meeting-with-companies-officials --NomanPK44 (talk) 01:19, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

 Done Added to that section. USaamo ^(t@lk) 14:41, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Best-selling PC game

PUBG is also the best selling PC game of all time with sales of about 42 million বিড়ালতপা চক্কোত্তি (talk) 23:54, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Brendan Greene Wikipedia page

Create a Brendan Greene Wikipedia page he should absolutely have one বিড়ালতপা চক্কোত্তি (talk) 21:35, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia has guidelines about who gets a page. Does Brendan Greene pass WP:GNG such as WP:NCREATIVE? —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 09:53, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Pubg India

There's an ongoing development of Pubg India for Indian users, abiding the government regulations, It has been approved by the government. SohamDG (talk) 12:05, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Pubg 1 billion download outside china

Can someone add that "Pubg has got over one billion downloads from outside of the china" source: https://gadgets.ndtv.com/games/news/pubg-mobile-download-1-billion-accumulated-tencent-games-china-global-overseas-2398649 Desa scholar (talk) 14:02, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

@Desa scholar:  Not done Content of source provided is from the same source as already included Reuters source, see last paragraph of PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds#Sales and downloads. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 14:20, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 10 March 2021

See also: Talk:List of most-played video games by player count § Semi-protected edit request on 14 January 2021

I need to update player count of this game which is 1 billion as of March 2021. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.tencent.ig Game for Game (talk) 03:26, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

We can't use storefront numbers for player counts. --Masem (t) 04:18, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Why? It's official List of most-played video games by player count is using it. Game for Game (talk) 05:03, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

That's not appropriate on that page, either. --Masem (t) 05:10, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Also, you're the one who added it there... -- ferret (talk) 13:46, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

No it's not. Storefront numbers are acceptable. Game for Game (talk) 08:19, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

https://dotesports.com/news/pubg-mobile-crosses-one-billion-downloads visit this page. Can I add it now? Game for Game (talk) 18:41, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Someone please reply to me? Game for Game (talk) 15:24, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Downloads does not equal players. --Masem (t) 15:34, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Actually, in Wikipedia's player count list's pages accept them as player counts. And also now this page depends on downloads which is discribed as 734 million. So why I cannot update it to 1 billion with reliable source? Game for Game (talk) 16:53, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Can I? Game for Game (talk) 05:41, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Is this page don't have any editors? Someone please make this happen. Immediately! Game for Game (talk) 14:40, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

@Game for Game: Agreed with Masem. Downloads doesn't equals to player count. I can simply download it and delete it and the application store counter wouldn't change or I can download it and not play it. Unless you can provide a reliable source that explictly stated the player count as per 2021 else your request to edit is invalid. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 14:56, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Just try to understand. We discussed this already (few months ago). And not only in this page. And we confirmed it. Because there is no other way to count the players. And if a user downloaded it several times, it doesn't matter. Because they count it as a one player. Game for Game (talk) 18:14, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

@Game for Game: I'm not sure where you discussed it or confirmed it. Maybe you're talking about your discussion on Talk:List of most-played video games by player count with Ferret, however Ferret didn't agreed with the statements you have made either. In addition, you seem to be agreeing with yourself and creating your consensus instead. Furthermore, you mentioned that I need to update player count of this game which is 1 billion as of March 2021, which sentence are you even talking about because nowhere did the article stated player count for PUBG Mobile. If you're referring to the player count found in previous revision, please note that I have changed it to reflect what was stated by the supporting source which explictly stated it as downloads count. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 05:23, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Then do you have another way to count the mobile players? Game for Game (talk) 06:12, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

@Game for Game: Nope, not sure why you keep insisting on player count when you can't even provide reliable source to support your claim despite me and other editor telling you that downloads count is not equals to player count. Unless, you can provide relable source that explictly stated PUBG Mobile has player count of 1 billion as of March 2021 instead of downloads count else your argument is invalid. Please also get yourself familarize with WP:NOT, WP:Reliable source and WP:VERIFY. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 06:48, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

The only source is this. Is it reliable enough? https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.tencent.ig

This says "The best Battle Royale game chosen by over 1 billion players worldwide." Game for Game (talk) 03:09, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

And I found another source says "PUBG Mobile is the FREE battle royale shooter that chosen by over 1 billion players worldwide."

Link - https://www.pubgmobile.com/en-US/home.shtml

Note - it's hard to find this sentence. So search on Google "1 billion players by pubgmobile.com" then it'll show this sentence. Game for Game (talk) 08:04, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

While it is still an issue of "downloads" vs "player count", we can reliable source the downloands now to this Reuters article, if that's to be added. --Masem (t) 13:18, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

@Masem:  Done Added as downloads because that was what stated by the reliable source. Not sure if it some paraphrasing is needed or not. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:43, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

But source that I gave says 1 billion players. Why we cannot use that? And please edit 734 million to 1 billion. Game for Game (talk) 15:40, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Another source - https://www.instagram.com/p/CM25H3LFQTR/?igshid=1n2hqebi002ad Game for Game (talk) 15:37, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Now just add this or let me? Game for Game (talk) 15:37, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Constantly linking the same primary source from their various different social media accounts isn't going to change anything. -- ferret (talk) 15:41, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

This doesn't make any sense. When I requested for a edit, you guys told to find reliable sources. When I added reliable source for this talk page, you guys won't add it. Why? Game for Game (talk) 06:47, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

@Game for Game: Did you even provide a reliable source to begin with? All I can see is that you keep linking primary sources and 1 user generated source and we have already told you many times that downloads count doesn't equals to player count despite that you keep insisting that you're right and keep questioning us if we can prove otherwise. Masem provided a reliable source from Reuters which stated it as downloads instead of player counts and we are just adding it accordingly. And like I have told you many times, provide a reliable source to support your claim and you don't seem to get the meaning and keep spamming primary sources which doesn't help to support your arguments.

In addition, I would appreciate that you indent your reply accordingly. You can see Help:Indent on how to do so. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 06:58, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

See this source. This proves downloads=players. It's says "one install per Apple ID or Google account". So it's doesn't matter how many times did you downloaded.

Source - PUBG Mobile, Game for Peace Global Revenue Hits $1.5 Billion in 2019 by news18.com Game for Game (talk) 17:09, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Update the lifetime revenue of PUBG Mobile.

As of March 2021. Tencent Games announced that PUBG MOBILE grossed 5.1 Billion dollars of it's lifetime revenue

Source - https://www.insidesport.co/pubg-mobile-crosses-usd-5-billion-lifetime-revenue-1-billion-downloads/ Game for Game (talk) 18:01, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 27 April 2021

Hey I wanna say PUBG(PC)LITE’s Operations Will Be Close On 30th April 2021 And They Would Release New Battle Royale Game Called ‘PUBG: NEW STATE’. Notdost (talk) 07:48, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Approve My Edit Request So I can edit it with legal source and refrences. Notdost (talk) 07:48, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

@Notdost: you need to provide reliable source in order for the editors with extended confirmed user rights to add it into the article. Do note that it is up to the responding editor discretion to rejected your request. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 08:18, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Okay. @Paper9oll Notdost (talk) 08:22, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 1 May 2021

I wanna extended PUBG MOBILE Article. Notdost (talk) 09:01, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Please give me permission. Notdost (talk) 09:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

@Notdost:  Not done – Already told you previously, it is not possible to grant you the permission to edit this article. You have to specify what changes you want to be made to the article and also provide the necessary reliable sources. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 09:07, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

I wanna say that PUBG LITE has closed that service.

Source : https://lite.pubg.com/2021/03/30/notice-april-29-service-termination-notice/ Notdost (talk) 09:09, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

PUBG LITE’s Service Is Closed. Notdost (talk) 09:10, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

@Notdost: It is already mentioned in the article, see #Personal computers, last sentence quote "Krafton announced they would be shutting down PUBG Lite as of April 29, 2021.". Do you happened to want to paraphrase this? — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 09:15, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 10 May 2021

2409:4063:4302:35D2:0:0:2D2:8A5 (talk) 03:43, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

 Not done – Please state what you would like to change. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 04:04, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

PUBG Battleground relaunch in India

After the ban of PUBG in India last year, now this year with all rumors & speculations, it is clearly seeing that it’s getting a major boost after the teaser relaunched got accidentally leaked by the officials. Sgoel785 (talk) 03:18, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Bsoyka (talk · contribs) 03:46, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 25 May 2021

please change this line from - "In March 2019...the game was "too addicting and violent" to "In March 2019...the game was "too addictive and violent" 2405:201:25:6015:65CE:A062:C368:CBEE (talk) 15:41, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

•  Done Actually, I went to the source, and don't see either version as quoted, and violence isn't mentioned, just addiction concerns, so I simply used "too addictive" without quotes. --Masem (t) 15:47, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

BGMI released.

Battlegrounds Mobile India have been launched on June 19, 2021. Add it to the page.

Source - https://nhmpunjab.in/battle-grounds-mobile-india-release-date/#:~:text=you%20can%20download%20BGMI%20App,launching%20on%2019%20June%202021. Game for Game (talk) 06:39, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Game Engine

I dont believe that pubg is built on unreal 4 sense Epic makes fortnite and the owner of pubg was in a legal battle over with epic because they made a game similar too them ill look into this more but ive dont recall their game ever being made on that engine I think unity is the engine its made on ill look into this more but just a thought sense a lawsuit for making a game similar too someone else would probably make/create conflict of interest also if pubg was built on unreal it would be on their store front I would imagine Jelly1991 (talk) 02:10, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 22 July 2021

developer fixes. 45.232.92.244 (talk) 01:27, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. -- ferret (talk) 01:37, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 23 July 2021

PUBG Corporation changed its name, now it is called PUBG Studios. Bluehole no longer exists, (it is not the main company) now they are just a development studio and the main company is Krafton, Krafton are the distributors on PC / PS4. Those errors must be corrected. 201.219.234.75 (talk) 05:13, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:04, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 23 July 2021 (2)

PUBG Corporation changes its name on November 27, 2018, it is now called 'PUBG Studios'. Bluehole is no longer the main company, now it is Krafton. Those mistakes must be corrected. Reliable sources: https://press.pubg.com/About-KRAFTON/Focus/PUBG-Studios-Logo 201.219.234.14 (talk) 17:30, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Partially done. We generally maintain the name of the studio and publisher as the game was first published, but I have added how Bluehole formed Krafton, and then later Krafton bringing the PUBG Corp into the internal studios and rebranding it (with a third-party source). --Masem (t) 17:54, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Do we need to rename this?

Basically, it appears Krafton has quietly rebranded the game as "PUBG Battlegrounds" [4], with that article stating they've confirmed that change with Krafton. But this might be a case of Common Name factors... --Masem (t) 12:56, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Give it a month or two to see if sources exclusively use that name. If it's still a mixed case then I wouldn't change it until they do. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 18:26, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 10 August 2021 (2)

Hello, I want to add information about renaming PUBG Corporation to PUBG Studios and Bluehole to Krafton to avoid confusion, in parentheses. I also want to add that PUBG became a brand, with various games, including PUBG: BATTLEGROUNDS and PUBG: NEW STATE. Jose Angel del Valle Nazco (talk) 03:42, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Precisely to become a brand, the term PUBG was adopted: BATTLEGROUNDS. Jose Angel del Valle Nazco (talk) 04:28, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:45, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

This process was already explained to the user on another talk page. Edit requests must specific state what to change, not what you want to change. An editor cannot make your change unless you provide exactly what text to alter and where it goes. -- ferret (talk) 12:13, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

What I want to do, specifically, is fix the home page. PUBG is developed by PUBG Corporation, I want to add a relative stating that it is currently PUBG Studios, and published by Krafton. Currently the game is published by Krafton on all platforms, and developed by PUBG Studios. I want to correct that as it can be misleading. Jose Angel del Valle Nazco (talk) 12:32, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

We go by how a game was first released, not what has happened since. We have noted that PUBG Corp is now PUBG Studios and Krafton as the publisher since release, but at release this was all PUBG Corp. And while we're aware that the game has had a quiet rebranding, most people still called it "PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds" so under WP:COMMONNAME we shouldn't yet change it. --Masem (t) 13:01, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

PUBG Universe

pubg has announced that battlegrounds, new state and callisto protocal are under pubg universe. Then why it's not set as a series in the infobox. like there are multiple games under call of duty series like modern warfare , black ops etc. since the name of the PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds is changed to PUBG:Battlegrounds in steam signifying that it is under the battlegrounds in pubg universe. reference 1: https://www.ign.com/articles/new-pubg-games-reportedly-coming-in-2021-and-2022 reference 2: https://pubg-universe.com/en/games reference 3: https://www.ign.com/articles/pubg-new-state-is-a-mobile-sequel-to-playerunknowns-battlegrounds 007sak (talk) 20:57, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

We can use the IGN sources, but its basically that we don't have any article yet on this PUBG universe because what its shape is we really have no idea, Krafton hasn't talked about it. Its a bit premature to consider it a series until those games are actually all out. --Masem (t) 21:38, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

I have listed the games that are announced by krafton which will come under pubg universe , but the actual structure is unknown , just a listing. Krafton#Games in PUBG Universe , if anything is found wrong in it consider editing :-) 007sak (talk) 14:34, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Moving to PUBG: Battlegrounds?

I've just reverted Boyohboy231's second attempt to rename this article to PUBG: Battlegrounds. I don't have an opinion one way or the other, but I do feel that it should be discussed here first. Also pinging Masem and 007sak, who have been involved in earlier discussions. --rchard2scout (talk) 09:43, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

It might be appropriate now that we now know that PlayerUnknown has actually left Krafton for his own company (a good reason why they want to push PUBG Battlegrounds) But I haven't reviewed enough of recent publications to affirm if the media has caught up to that. --Masem (t) 12:36, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Addition of Game Features such as Maps or Seasons

Would it be appropriate to request a page dedicated to the different seasons or different maps associated with PUBG? Just wondering how we can improve this article and make it look more like high quality articles for other games. Thanks! Warzone14 (talk) 05:13, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 31 October 2021

PUBG Corporation changed its name, now it is called PUBG Studios and Bluehole is called Krafton, so in the beginning text they should put: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (also known as PUBG: Battlegrounds) is an online multiplayer battle royale game developed and published by PUBG Corporation, (current PUBG Studios), a subsidiary of Bluehole, (current Krafton). To prevent confusions. 201.219.234.204 (talk) 16:14, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

 Done. This change was made by another editor. Heartmusic678 (talk) 10:56, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Rename?

I know I've been on the side of not renaming this, but given details from the Game Awards, it seems like more are calling this "PUBG Battlegrounds", so the question is if it is time to move this? --Masem (t) 03:13, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

• Support I believe this is long overdue. In addition, the term/name "PUBG" is more common used/referred to as compare to PlayerUnknown's Battleground. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 03:24, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 11 December 2021

"Its is a massive multiplayer online role playing GAME (MMORPG)" Please add this or let me. Karrarmehdi2 (talk) 14:27, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:52, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection

Does this page still needs an Extended confirmed protection? I wanted to edit that the game has gone Free To Play but I can't. ForTheGoodOfAllofUs (talk) 16:17, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

I've lowered protection but will be monitoring in case it needs raised again. -- ferret (talk) 18:40, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 16 February 2022

In the Gameplay Subheading:

Change, 'PUBG is a player versus player shooter game in which up to one hundred players fight in a battle royale, a type of large-scale last man standing deathmatch where players fight to remain the last alive. Players can choose to enter the match solo, duo, or with a small team of up to four people.'

to

'PUBG is a player versus player shooter game in which up to one hundred players fight in a battle royale, a type of large-scale last man standing deathmatch where players fight to remain the last alive. Players can choose to enter the match solo, duo, or with a small team of up to four people. In solo mode, players can choose to compete exclusively against other solos, or in '1-man-squad' can solo against squads of one to four players.'

You can use this link as a citation for the term "1-man-squad" https://gamingyeeter.com/2020/10/20/pubg-hack-why-i-always-play-tpp-1-man-squad-instead-of-solo/ DrLaserfalcon (talk) 05:29, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

 Not done for now: Please provide secondary news source instead. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:07, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 7 December 2022

Hey there my fellow Wikipedians! This edit request is for update the revenue figures I'm this article, as it seems they are quite out dated. See List of highest-grossing mobile games for the current revenue figures. Best regards! Gaayhan (talk) 19:04, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

 Partly done @Gaayhan: I added the figures for PUBG Mobile (from [5]), but I can't find it for the franchise as a whole. Your assistance there would be appreciated; feel free to ping me, or wait for someone else. Ovinus (talk) 22:59, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Ovinus: Thank you for updating the article, but it seems it's not completely done yet, for example information in the lede still remains out dated. This article requires more minor changes too. I just hope you or someone else would take care of them, or else is that possible for me to edit this article? Gaayhan (talk) 04:50, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Hey Gaayhan, you'll automatically be able to edit the article in a bit, on 11 December 2022 at 08:21, about two days from right now. That's a technical limitation that I can't lift, but I suggest you just be patient. In the meantime, feel free to give me news articles which contain the figures. I'm unable to immediately find the sources myself. Ovinus (talk) 04:56, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: According to the page's protection level you should be able to edit the page yourself. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. Lemonaka (talk) 18:37, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

I already did, thank you. Gaayhan (talk) 03:21, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Can I edit, because the PUBG is on other platforms not mentioned on the Wiki page

Games like PUBG, Call of Duty and more adapted Huawei's HarmonyOS - RPRNA Manutidue (talk) 07:27, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Modding Support

The article states that PUBG supports modding but it never has, despite originally claiming they wanted to and would add it. It *does* have custom matches so that part is correct. 50.89.27.46 (talk) 21:28, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 5 January 2024

202.47.56.196 (talk) 15:46, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Rehsarb (talk) 16:03, 5 January 2024 (UTC)