User talk:Manutidue

Hello Manutidue! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:33, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

June 2023

Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Modern Combat 5: Blackout, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 06:45, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Modern Combat, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 06:49, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For Angry birds 2 is this a reliable source for AppGallery HarmonyOS Angry Birds 2 from Gizmochina https://www.gizmochina.com/2021/06/28/angry-birds-2-now-available-appgallery-special-offers/ or Phandroid phandroid.com/2021/06/29/huawei-thinks-angry-birds-2-will-convince-people-to-start-using-harmonyos/ Manutidue (talk) 07:15, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Neither have been discussed at WP:VG/RS or WP:RSP, but the Phandroid ref seems fine to me. Waxworker (talk) 07:30, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok great. I will put citations around the Phandroid ref. Thank you for the response. I want to be extra vigilant with wiki edits and avoid unsourced content. Manutidue (talk) 07:34, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

HarmonyOS NEXT moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to HarmonyOS NEXT. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because It needs better sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:12, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok, thank you, that makes sense. Manutidue (talk) 15:13, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: HarmonyOS NEXT (August 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This was launched 23 days ago. The references are all PR pieces. WP:TOOSOON

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:HarmonyOS NEXT and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:15, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Manutidue! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:15, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello Manutidue. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to HarmonyOS, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Manutidue. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Manutidue|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Amigao (talk) 01:09, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are mistaken, I am not being directly nor indirectly compensated for my edits. I am an HarmonyOS user evangelist because I am a OpenHarmony programmer as part of the open source community hence my knowledge on HarmonyOS is broad. I am not an exclusive editor on the HarmonyOS Wiki page despite contributing alot to the page. Manutidue (talk) 21:41, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:BenHDev per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BenHDev. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 08:47, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Manutidue (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have followed every rule of Wikipedia with Wikimedia Terms of Use and have not made multiple accounts, this is my Wikipedia account and I am falsely accused of being paid by Huawei, I am not Chinese, I am black African British born in the United Kingdom and I feel that I am unfairly targeted in this racist attack by Wikipedia mods

Decline reason:

Clear and blatant violation of WP:NPA. Yamla (talk) 10:56, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Racist? I know roughly where you are, because I've looked at the IP addresses you've edited from, but how on Earth do you think I could have had any thoughts about what your race was. The block is based entirely on the behavioural similarities between this account and the previously blocked ones. Your unblock request is unlikely to be taken seriously while it contains such a baseless attack on the integrity of the administrators who have dealt with you. Girth Summit _(blether) 10:42, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have reported you to Wikipedia mods higher up for the racist attacks Manutidue (talk) 10:49, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It goes against Policy:Friendly space policy, so it will be dealt with and I have reported to get someone else to take this matter seriously. Manutidue (talk) 10:56, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Manutidue (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here I have been unfairly targeted for baseless accusations of being a Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BenHDev and I will continue to appeal this decision. I hope a genuine Wikipedia mod can resolve this situation. Thank you very much

Decline reason:

I am a "genuine Wikipedia mod". And I fully concur with GS's reading of this. Also, with these continued allegations of racism being thrown about, talk page access revoked. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:11, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I don't know who the 'higher up mods' you've reported me to are, but I will note for the benefit of the reviewing administrator that BenHDev also used the term 'moderator' (as opposed to administrator or sysop, which are the terms generally used here), and they also threatened to report the blocking administrator to other moderators for abuse in response to their block; while the accusations of racism are new, nothing about your response here does anything to dispel my belief that you are the same person. Girth Summit _(blether) 11:38, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:HarmonyOS NEXT

Hello, Manutidue. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:HarmonyOS NEXT, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:05, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:HarmonyOS NEXT

Hello, Manutidue. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "HarmonyOS NEXT".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:13, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]