This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand Afghanistan-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AfghanistanWikipedia:WikiProject AfghanistanTemplate:WikiProject AfghanistanAfghanistan articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Hi all; based on everything read over the last couple of years about the Operation Freedom's Sentinel, the operation only concerns the deployment of American forces to Afghanistan (USFOR-A)-both in training, advising and supporting the Afghan government and ANDSF, as well as counter-terrorism missions-as part NATO's overall Resolute Support Mission. Other nations are deployed to Afghanistan under the their own operations e.g. Operation Toral (Britain), Operation Highroad (Australia) etc. as part of RSM, and at this time, there doesn't seem to be any sources that say their part of OFS. So shouldn't these nations be removed from the listing in the info box? I'm guessing the listing of these nations was based on Wikipedia's article about Operation Enduring Freedom? during the course of 13 years that operation lasted, coalition forces episodically were under US command e.g. Polish SOF was under US command, as was the majority of British SOF during the 2001 invasion, in addition to their own operations. I'm not ruling out that some of the other nation's contingents have personnel under OFS command, but at this point there doesn't seem to be any references or information out there that supports this, so it could be misleading and confusing to the reader when differentiating between RSM and OFS and therefore should be removed, until at least more precise information becomes available. Of course if anyone has any information that justifies their inclusion in the infobox, link it. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blackwidow97 (talk • contribs) 15:34, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A few editors are determined to have the words "Taliban victory" in the infobox result. I'm not sure what this adds if the very next words are "Islamic Republic falls to the Taliban." A few other editors have inserted "al-Qaeda/ISIS defeated." While NATO participants might like to believe that, there's no mention of it in the May US defense department report. 73.71.251.64 (talk) 20:10, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
_without_national_boundaries.svg)
