Talk:Offset Software

This article was nominated for deletion on 31 October 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (7 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (3 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Why?

Can the deleter of this page please explain why it was deleted without asking the community, or even putting it up for deletion first? Havok (T/C/e/c) 19:25, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You really should ask that directly of User:Tone on their talk page. Protesting here does not do a huge amount of good. Tone did not give a deletion reason, so I can only speculate, but I would guess that it was deleted as A7 non-notable corporation. This would have fallen under speedy deletion, and no debate or notice is required for speedy deletions. Please do see WP:CORP for notability requirements for corporations. If you cannot show that those requirements are met, then you are likely fighting a losing battle here. But anyway, talk to Tone first, to get a specific explanation of the deletion. If you still have a problem, you can allways post a request for a review at WP:DRV. - TexasAndroid (talk) 21:08, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Only now I see what was the problem. The person who tagged it db-spam placed the tag under the infobox so it didn't show up in the log. Anyway, the article is restored and on afd now. --Tone 22:02, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possible sources

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL -- Banjeboi 03:10, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Split June 2012

The reason given for the split tag is
""obvious reason", the game was notable due to all the coverage"
I am opposed to this because:
1) The reason given is not a reason to split.
2) The material covering Project Offset is too small to make a viable article.
3) The material covering Project Offset does not dominate the article.
4) The article is too small to justify a split on size alone.

This article is not ready to split at this time. Op47 (talk) 13:45, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]