Talk:Nenjil Or Aalayam

Nenjil Or Aalayam has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 4, 2015	Good article nominee	Listed

India: Tamil Nadu / Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[The Atlantic#The Wire|The Wire]] The anchor (#The Wire) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Nenjil Or Aalayam/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 07:29, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Will look at this shortly, I've been busy with Sinatra!♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:40, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Couldn't see much wrong with it, I fixed 5 or 6 things myself I think to save you doing it. Good effort.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:19, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld Thank you very much, Dr. Blofeld. Thamizhan1994 (^{Appo Pesu}) 03:37, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]