Talk:Nenjil Or Aalayam/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 07:29, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Will look at this shortly, I've been busy with Sinatra!♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:40, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
Couldn't see much wrong with it, I fixed 5 or 6 things myself I think to save you doing it. Good effort.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:19, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Dr. Blofeld Thank you very much, Dr. Blofeld. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 03:37, 5 October 2015 (UTC)