Jump to content

Talk:Nawaz Sharif/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Untitled

Why are you changing his background the man is a pure Kashmiri with his family originating in Shopian, in Kashmir Valley. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.103.243.226 (talk) 14:43, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

"ORIGINAL RESEARCH" REMOVED

This article is heavily made up of unsourced, possibly (though untraceable) original research or opinion - not appropriately cited research and verifiable fact. I started added citation requests, but there are simply way too many unverified claims here. I'm removing them so that NPOV researchers can start from a clean slate and build a legitimate article about the subject.Dstewart sailor (talk) 16:30, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

CORRUPTION

why is all his info on corruption missing, this article seems like its been written by his wife, info needs to be put there about his many corruption scandels, like karz utao, ghar apna scheme and his many loan defaults. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.206.107.222 (talk) 17:34, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Assassination

Cleaned up the details related to the Bhutto assassination, including adding a section header, etc. Tried to make the language a bit more neutral and less stilted, and some of those facts are going to need to be verified. Also cleaned up some of the grammar, but there were a lot of mistakes so I might not have gotten them all.--69.239.135.53 (talk) 20:11, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Grammar

Parts of this article need re-writing to correct their bad grammar. A number of sentences are unnecessarily long or short, are informal in their style or otherwise are incorrect. Areas requiring attention include the Military Coup section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.200.37.155 (talk) 01:18, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Succession

In his first tenure as PM he was actually succeeded by Miraj Khalid as "caretaker PM" (see Prime Minister of Pakistan), who in turn was succceeded by BB.--iFaqeer 18:50, Sep 15, 2004 (UTC)

NPOV

This article seems very biased against Sharif, particularly as you go further in there are many NPOV phrases including direct accusations of corruption and incompetence. I DO NOT KNOW ENOUGH TO EDIT but I wanted to flag this as really needing attention. Palnu

The article doesn't actually say that he was corrupt. It says that his administration suffered from "corruption" and "incompetence". One could make the case that he himself was corrupt and incompetent, but that is not exactly what is being said here.
Incompetence. I'll grant you that incompetence is somewhat subjective. I'll modify the article accordingly.
Corruption. A court found him guilty of corruption, tax evasion and embezzlement. His government was widely regraded as corrupt in Pakistan. Many neutral sources have said that his government was corrupt, as have former members of his own party. Columnist Ayaz Amir, who ran in 2002 as a candidate in Sharif's own PML-N party, said that he "proved to be as corrupt and inefficient as Benazir" [1]
From [2] (the article lists other references at the bottom)
  • The British newspaper, Observer, on Sept. 27, 1998, published a report revealing that Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif has amassed a personal fortune siphoning off millions of dollars from his country's coffers. The Pakistani Federal Investigation Agency report, revealed to the paper by the FIA's suspended second in command Rahman Malik, was also sent to President Rafiq Tarar. The Observer said that the 200-page report was begun while Sharif was out of power but effectively stifled after he and his Islamic Democratic Alliance party returned to lead the country in February 1997. It said the investigation reveled how Sharif's assets included four flats in London's exclusive Mayfair, worth more than $5 million. More than $70 million was also said to have been traced to accounts and companies controlled by the family. The inquiry was focused on Sharif's Ittefaq group of companies, which grew rapidly during his first term in power in 1990-93. It was alleged that the group received billions of rupees in loans, which were not repaid. Around $8 million is said to be held offshore, and another $50 million in Switzerland. Explaining the modus operandi for money laundering by Sharif family, the report of Rehman Malik stated that Rs. 140 million were siphoned in collusion with Hawala group of Peshawar using the Bank of Oman. The money was repatriated in the form of FEBCs in the name of 43 family members, which include the mother, brother, sister and other close relatives of Mr. Nawaz Sharif.
During Sharif's second term, Pakistan was rated as one of the the most corrupt countries in the world by Transparency International.
The available evidence indicates that there was corruption in Sharif's administration.

Egalitus 21:03, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)

I've toned down the "incompetence" statements. I'd like to invite comment on the neutrality of the overall article. Egalitus 22:14, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Removed references to Indian "adventurism" in the nuclear test section.

Sharif returned to power in February 1997 with such a huge majority that the result was immediately questioned by Bhutto's Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP). Sharif won by obtaining 90 percent of the national votes cast. Doubts against the authenticity of the national elections always persist and are nearly always contended by Pakistan's losing party. Tony Blair stated in a January interview that he "believed the election was true". Nawaz Sharif, therefore, holds the record in Pakistani politics for securing the heaviest mandate in a general election in Pakistan.

I'd like to resume the neutrality debate, only, not necessarily for or against Sharif, but against the validity of the election results in his favor in 1997. Unlike the last person who raised this concern, I would say that the article is biased in favor of him, or at least the "mandate" he supposedly received. And last I checked, Tony Blair's word shouldn't be taken on anything. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Homoaffectional (talk • contribs) 17:29, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

PPP

In this paragraph:

The general election of February 1997 saw Nawaz Sharif’s party sweeping back into power with such a huge majority that the result was immediately questioned by the PPP.

Is the PPP the Pakistan People's Party? If so, this should be fixed to not use that undefined abbreviation. I'd do it, but I'm not sure that's what's being referred to here. CDC (talk) 30 June 2005 17:08 (UTC)

Ashtonishing Fact: Nawaz was convicted of corruption, and a whole host of other charges. But i never thought of him as corrupt because there hasn't been that much attention in the papers. However, i used to assume Bhutto was corrupt, she has never been convicted! Did everyone know this? or am i just ignorant.

Reply: It is very difficult to convict powerful people in Third World countries like Pakistan. This is due to their enormous power and their tactics of intimidating and corrupting police and judiciaries. Undoubtedly both Bhutto and Sharif are theives.

What about the cases around the world Bhutto has been vindicated in a case in england where the judge said "the NAB were master puppteers of the witch hunt" and the recent AGR which proves that the president funneled money into politicaly motivated charges against BB. I have my doubts but i still believe that some one sould be innocent until proven guilty and surely the current government has more influence in the courts that Bhutto.

Bhutto may not have been convicted due to fleeing the country, but her husband Asif Zirdari has been, and she would have people believe that she nothing of his dealings - in which case she was the only person in Pakistan that did not know his nickname, Mr.10% Streona (talk) 23:12, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Order of points in article

The current ordering is not chronologically accurate, and seems disjointed: for instance, the "charges" section contains largely details of what is mentioned in the "coup" section, and should logically follow it, in any event (instead, it is two points before it in the present article). Should this not be mended?

Fair use rationale for Image:Quaid nawaz.jpg

Image:Quaid nawaz.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:45, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Cell Phone

"On September 10, 2007, Nawaz Sharif arrived in Islamabad on a PIA flight from London but was prevented from leaving the plane. This has resulted in massive protests all over Islamabad with several of his supporters reported to have been killed. Musharraf reportedly turned off all cellular services in the vicinity of the airport, creating a massive inconvenience for the people living in twin cities of Rawalpindi/Islamabad. Furthermore, Nawaz Sharif has refused to hand over his passport to Immigration, increasing the chances of him being either deported to Saudi Arabia or arrested and thrown in jail in Pakistan." It is important to mention the rationale of such an action, which was to prevent the useof Cell phones to initiate a Terrorist incident to free Sharif.Alexander 08:06, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

POV Problem

"Nawaz Sharif arrived in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, having played his small part in the clown show that Pakistani government has evolved to be." This is obvious editorial. Pygmypony 13:43, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Indeed. Let me also remind editors that Wikipedia is not a news blog. True, some rather important events are happening in the present in Mr Sharif's life, so it's difficult to determine what is and what isn't important, but I'm pretty sure, for instance, that his return, arrest and deportation require at most two sentences. Please try and trim some of the fat out of this very bloated article. Biruitorul 03:02, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
This article is a complete mess. Lots of stuff, especially duplication, needs to be deleted wholesale, and the rest fixed for POV. Wizzy…☎ 11:48, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Democracy activist??

I've been doing a good deal of work in Category:Democracy activists, and I just came across Mr. Sharif's name. I'm somewhat dubious as to whether he is properly described as a "Democracy activist". There's nothing in the article to indicate that he has, in fact, been a "Democracy activist" -- with the possible exception of his attempt to return to Pakistan, which struck me as more of an attempt to re-enter politics than anything else. I did look through the edit history as far back as March 2006 in hopes of finding out what specific editor had put him in the Category, but that's as far as I could go (the category was already there at that point). So I would appreciate it if some knowledgable editors would be good enough to comment on this. Cgingold 09:11, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

My wife was a democracy activist whom Sharif's goons attempted to assassinate as a result, crippling her in the process.--Streona (talk) 21:21, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Misleading posts

Seriously, who put this in?

"Musharraf reportedly turned off all cellular services in the vicinity of the airport, creating a massive inconvenience for the people living in twin cities of Rawalpindi/Islamabad.

Nawaz Sharif was arrested upon arrival and taken to jail for further investigations"

How did Musharraf "reportedly turned off all cellular services", and whats the article/news supporting that? And "Nawaz Sharif was arrested and taken to jail", I never knew we had a "jail" at the Islamabad Airport, and again, there is no news to back that up, and even then, we all know he was not "taken to jail".

There is a military airbase that shares the airport, as you can see the Hercules transporters there, and they probably have a brig or something. Streona (talk) 23:16, 16 November 2007 (UTC) Atleast try to make sense when writing such crap! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fahadzkhan (talk • contribs) 06:23, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

"Deported" or "Exiled"?

While journalists can be sloppy, Wikipedia should hold to higher standards. You "deport" aliens; you can't "deport" a citizen. It would be more accurate therefore to speak of "forced to leave the country under an arrangement with Saudi Arabia to grant him temporary residence, with restrictions on his movement, travel, and other activities" or "forced exile" or just "exile" rather than "deported" everywhere in this entry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.29.197.20 (talk) 03:54, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

corruption charges

This paragraph needs some serious work:

Nawaz Sharif was also involved in corruption at the highest level during his tenure which brought further mistrust of the people towards his government. The Nawaz government launched a scheme called "Karz utaro, Mulk savaro" whose intent was to pay off debt of the nation through the Pakistani people's pockets. Pakistanis took part aggressively and emotionally to help Pakistan pay off the debt. Many Pakistanis living abroad took part in this scheme extensively and sent millions (maybe billions) to help pay off the debt. Even the poor living in the country helped, to the extent that women sold their jewellery to help the cause, but to no avail. As of this date, it is not known what happened to the funds and the national debt never decreased. It is widely believed that the scheme was to benefit Nawaz Sharif & family, and not to pay off the country's debt.

In addition to being entirely unsourced, the text seems to convey a specific POV, and is filled with emotional charges more befitting an op-ed column than an encyclopedia. If anyone knows anything about the subject and can fix it up, please do so. --Bachrach44 19:53, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Recent Photograph Needed

Nawaz Sharif appears to have more hair now. Streona (talk) 00:35, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

This article is completely BS. Nawaz sharif wanted to enforce Islamic law in Pakistan! Why dont you show this pretty little link?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/189735.stm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.38.170.14 (talk) 02:41, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

He is a mullah

Didn't Nawaz Sharif just get off the phone from his conversation with Hussain Ahmad and Muhammad Omar?05:30, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Relations with the military

It seems to me that some of the statements in this section are particularly strong, especially as this section completely lacks any kind of sourcing e.g.:

In October 1998, however, true to form, Sharif fell out with General Karamat as well, over the latter’s advocacy of the need for the creation of a National Security Council in what Sharif believed was a conspiracy to return the military to a more active role in Pakistani politics.

Also, what does "Jehangir Karamat was much later appreciated by Nawaz as a gentleman." mean? Valclav (talk) 03:55, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Attack at Kargal Chowk

The assertion that PML(Q) was behind the attack is not sourced and unless it is,, reasonably soon, it should be deleted.

This article appears now to be POV pro Sharif and the corruption references dropped. It needs to be rebalanced. Streona (talk) 18:50, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

What Court decision in 2007 ?

The article says that the Government was called upon to respect the court decision, but what court decision ? The only ones I can determine from the article is the one convicting him of terrorism and the one banning him from standing for election. I cannot see where the Governme t has a problem with either of these.

Also, what is the "Punjabi religious movement" of the late 1800s that Sharif and his family may or may not have been influenced by ?

And after people all over Pakistan gave Nawaz Sharif their jewellery towards the national debt-did anyone get any back ? Streona (talk) 19:15, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

He was NOT convicted in Absentia

Mr. Sharif was not convicted in absentia for the place hiijacking case. After convicton, while Mr. Sharif was serving the sentence, he was also sentence for corruption charges as well.

Details can be found at: Sharif convicted of corruption

Or,

Former Pakistani premier Sharif sentenced to life in prison

Or

‎Nawaz Sharif sentenced

Aursani (talk) 15:52, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Early life

While describing his early life the article says: He also played a side match against West Indies when he was prime minister.

Correction: He was chief minister Punjab and not prime minister at that time. It was in late 1980s. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.128.4.231 (talk) 10:20, 31 March 2008 (UTC)


Maybe someone should add that his ancestors were ethnic Persians from Afghanistan that migrated to Kashmir between the 19th and 20th century. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.59.202.45 (talk) 15:16, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Reinstating Judges

When Sharif was last in power he used his powers to appoint loads of his own party goons as judges. Why should these people be re instated ?--Streona (talk) 13:57, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Charges

This is redundant and confusing:

The Supreme Court of Pakistan, upholding the position of the Army, disqualified Nawaz Sharif from banned him from holding public office and participating in Pakistani politics for 21 years and fined him 20 million rupees. A plea bargain and intervention of the Saudi royal family spared Sharif from serving a prison term; instead he was exiled to the Saudi Kingdom.

Corruption charges

While serving the life term in jail for plane-hijacking case, Sharif was also charged and sentenced to 14 years imprisonment for corruption and tax evasion charges. The ‎Accountability Court of Pakistan has also disqualified him from holding any public office for 21 ‎years, and fined him 20 million rupees, about US$37,000.[10]

So who exactly disqualified him from politics? The Supreme Court or the Accountability Court? Which court fined him? And which one tried to imprison him? These two paragraphs successively claim that it was the Supreme Court, then that it was the Accountability Court. For all I know these are the same court in Pakistan. Someone with more information should rework this.

The Picture is Terrible

The picture shown at the beginning of the article is horrible. It should only be a picture of him. PonileExpress (talk) 22:30, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Overlinking

I've reverted anons several times on this now. We do not need or want almost every word in the article linked. See here. The problem is that it's unnecessary and an eyesore. Here is what I keep reverting. Unless I'm miscounting, "Prime Minister" is linked 17 times in the anon's edits. 17! And things such as British Prime Minister should be British Prime Minister instead. It's just way way overkill. If the word has relevancy to the article, then it should be linked once or twice. That's right from the Manual of Style. I keep reverting the edits by the anons because very few of the links they are adding need to be added. I'm going to go through and add a few links that should probably be there (Rafiq Tarar is an example). Almost everything else being added by the anons is overkill. --User:Woohookitty Diamming fool! 10:48, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Shareef brothers are rendered ineligible for election

Three member supreme court bench headed by musa laghari has rendered shareef brother ineligible.this has resulted in wide protest and anger in punjab where popularity of shareef brother has been escalating.Shahbaz shareef,brother of former prime minister,nawaz shareef no longer remains the chief minister of punjab.this decision has arrived at time when pakistan has been confronting insurgencies in its north western borders and country is in great choas and anarchy,with state institutions at each other throats.supporter of PML(N)have chanted slogans against the president zardari who is in china on official visit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Readingpassion (talk • contribs) 11:35, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

have added section. let's continue to watch this and to add materials as necessary. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 20:57, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

This article is an embarrassment to Wikipedia.

This article is badly written, confusing, contradictory, repetitive, poorly sourced, the timelines are disordered - in all ways not of the quality one would expect in an encyclopedia. There are simply too many defects to list. The whole thing should be scrapped and a new one composed by people who know what they're doing and who know how to find and use reputable sources. It's appalling that an article of such poor quality is Wikipedia's attempt at informing the readers about a man of such importance and influence in a country the size and significance of Pakistan. One way to start would be to have a section delineating his positive accomplishments and another his negative impacts. There should be an attempt to find sources that are as unbiased and dispassionate as possible, such as United Nations and other global official and NGO reports. Another suggestion would be to describe how it is that Sharif is a billionaire in a country as poor as Pakistan. As it stands now, this article is virtually useless. Wlegro (talk) 20:00, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

One problem that appears to plague the article is a near-constant stream of crude vandalism. Rpine75 (talk) 20:27, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

This article seems incredibly biased

His religion is listed as "corruption." Obviously this page has been manipulated in an unfair way. The introductory paragraph in particular only lists negative attributes. This page should be looked at by an uninterested third party. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.38.168.63 (talk) 21:18, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

I agree. e.g. "During the early 1990s, Sharif's administration failed to arrest the 30 percent fall in the value of the Pakistani Rupee from 21 to 30 Rupees against the US Dollar. Sharif, made millions of dollars during the currency crises while the people of Pakistan suffered from high inflation and corruption." this can only be said by a PPP maniac. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.49.106.63 (talk) 14:39, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

What does he stand for?

There's all this talk here about whether this article is biased, but it doesn't say anything except about some events and that he's for a free judiciary. What are the planks of his party platform?

Why does the article not mention of PML N's attack on Supreme court, or of Nawaz throwing Sajjad Ali Shah in jail for one night, or of making him resign from his post. This indeed seems like is written by someone from his party or family! What about the scam like Qarz Utaro, Yellow Cab, Apna Ghar? It is a pathetic article! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ziaullahfm (talk • contribs) 05:21, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

`Ineligibility to contest` needs rewrite and citation

The section documents current events in March of 2009 but the information to date is uncited. The current state of popular opinion re Sharif following these recent events is also conjecture until some time has passed. Political trends are difficult to document realtime, though I honor the work of the OP in attempting to do so. 12.190.158.6 (talk) 21:24, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Categozation as criminal removed

I have now removed Category:Pakistani criminals from this article based on the guidelines expounded at Wikipedia:Categorization of people#Biographies of living people which reads: For example, Category:Criminals should only be added if the incident is relevant to the person's notability; it has been published by reliable third-party sources; the subject was convicted; and the conviction was not overturned on appeal. However serious the event, it is not relevant to the person's notability in this case. Since all four criteria have to be met this means that the category must go. Now, this leaves a paradox as Category:Hijackers remains in the article, but I find this to be the right thing to do for now. __meco (talk) 07:50, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

His thugs nearly killed my wife.He could have been hanged for hijacking & terrorism in trying to take down Musharraf's plane; a scheduled PIA airliner full of people. That's quite noteworthy, before we even start on the corruption charges.--Streona (talk) 10:43, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
True enough, but that isn't the point I was making when removing these categories. The phrase should only be added if the incident is relevant to the person's notability suggests to me that the category shouldn't be included. The reason I have reversed my position (however tentatively) is also connected to current discussion at Talk:Kjell Inge Røkke concerning whether a Norwegian businessman and celebrity, who had bribed an official in order to obtain a skipper's licence for his pleasure craft, should be categorized as a criminal. __meco (talk) 17:06, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

mumrez iqbal

Dear Sir,

My Name is mumrez Iqbal.I served Govt Sertvent,sir your my/over great leaader,I pray to Allah for you that your prograsive in Pakistan.Your Good leader in Pakistan.I am small person your greatman.please sir your not maind my talk.Pakistan thew nade of Grate leader Nawaz Sharif.I pray to Allah for You that Your More Great leader.

Your Obident Mumnrez Iqbal—Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.154.30.9 (talk) 08:36, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Nawaz Sharif is a convicted terrorist and a corrupt politician. General Musharaf was too lenient and it is Sharif who should be thanking Allah that he did not end up like the Bhuttos.--Streona (talk) 13:30, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Reverting the edits of GeneralNeo & YawarSid

1) I am not a political activist of PML nor I ever wanted to be. Wikipedia is far greater project for me than keeping Sharif's reputation. The contention is simple, remove anything and everything which goes against NPOV

2) Mentioning of Operation Cleanup is necessary to have in the section First Term the reason behind that is its recent wide media propagation. Now when some one says "In 1992 he commenced Operation Clean-up in the city of Karachi, a military operation targeting the Mohajir Qaumi Movement" and provide a complete unreliable reference like [1], then its quite necessary to bring in the other perspective and to be precise, the perspective of the accused. I provided with a solid reference of The News article which describes the complete time line of the sequence of events as well as the background to the situation. Apparently it is being removed for no reason. If it is getting controversial that who started the operation against who, NPOV would remain intact by stating "It was during this period when a military offensive was launched against party (A) because of reason (A)(citation), while party (A) thinks it was because of the reason (B)(citation)"

3) The section "Connections to Osama Bin Laden and Talibaan" is created on the basis of the information from a blog called changepk.com and a site asking for public donations, cooperativeresearch.org, none of them qualify to become a reference in the first place. Nawaz connection with osama has been mentioned in one authentic article from dailytimes and that will still find its place in the article.

4) Some more defamatory material was added in "Proposition of an Islamic society based on the Quran". The reference provided is not a news story, not a news headline, not a research report from a well known author, but is an opinion of an article writer. Just to provide with an example, there are several writers who call Musharraf as George Bush's dog, Gearge Bush as biggest terrorist and Obama a false prophet, now these opinions should NOT find their place at wikipedia article. Even if the article writer has his Masters in Journalism from Mars, the article should say, "according to the Marsian article writer, Nawaz Sharif is a an XYZ" and not. Nawaz Sharif is an XYZ.

5) Placing the section Assassination of Benazir after discussing General Elections of 2008 makes absolutely no sense at all. The rearrangement breaks the chain of events and confuses the reader. In one para he reads it as, Nawaz won this many seats right in the next he has been th rusted to read assassination of benazir.

I hope I have made myself clear Sarmadhassan (talk) 02:04, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Meeting with Osama bin Laden and Interview of ex-ISI agent

1. As far as I can see the site is not trying to create itself a referencing source or authority but giving references to two different stories published in Indian Express and Times of India (http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/news/world/pakistan/Nawaz-Sharif-met-Osama-five-times-Ex-ISI-official/articleshow/4989203.cms and http://www.expressindia.com/news/fullstory.php?newsid=49342) which are needless to mention are websites of two famous newspapers of India. So for your information the section of Taliban and Osama Bin Laden has nothing to do with changepk.com as it doesn't claim to be a source instead displays valuable discussion of the story along with the ex-ISI officer named Khalid Khawaja.

2. The website hosts the video interview of the ex-ISI agent involved in setting up meeting of Osama bin Laden, nothing found elsewhere on the web with explanation of what it is, thus creating value for Wikipedia readers.

3. The conclusion is simple, do everything to maintain NPOV and provide valuable contents.

I hope this all make sense :) --YawarSid (talk) 11:25, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

The topic of discussion is not whether Nawaz meet osama or not, the point is, whether it should be mentioned as a separate section with a H2 heading tag. The website might be providing references to authentic sources but the primary reference given is severely defamatory and written as a general public blog. Moreover it is repeatedly placed in external links. External links are supposed to provide overall biography, political status, articles written, speeches conducted of BOLP and not an article discussing a particular issue, in this case Osama and Nawaz.

If for some reason fellow editors thinks of this as absolutely necessary then I would also like the same editors to place a separate section naming, "Connections To Taliban" in the article Ronald Regan with reference [2] along with quotes of Regan about Taliban during cold war plus an external link to the reference provided.

Out of numerous genuine article, research reports on Nawaz available and from nowhere out from the dark one ISI agent comes in to say he arranged a meeting of Nawaz and Osama and wikipedia article to have the seperate section for it does not any value for a reader because its like placing a spot light on a fly in Royal Ballet .

Wikipedia goes with trends. It is not an issue today but tomorrow if the whole print, electronic media start discussing the issue on a wide scale and I can see articles written on that in Newyork times, CNN taking expert opinions on the issue, BBC making a documentaries, and foreign offices raising the issue on diplomatic level. I will not only place this section but will expand it.

Sarmadhassan (talk) 21:51, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

While I hold Sarmad's opinion in respect, but I agree with YawarSid.

1- This story detailing Nawaz's sympathy with Taliban and his connections to Osama-bin-Ladeb are not recent revelations. The story goes back as far as early 1990's and also printed in 2005. This was reported by several US based Newspapers including ABC News, The Sun New York in 2008 and also detailed by History Commons Organization.

2- Changepk is not the original source and has merely quoted an incident that was reported way back in 2005 by Asia Times and revisited in 2008 as well.

3- A former senior State Department South Asia specialist, Daniel Markey, acknowledged that Mr. Sharif had "connections" to Al Qaeda in the 1990s. But he said it would be incorrect to call the former premier an Islamist.[3]

4- In an interview with a national Urdu daily, Qazi Hussain Ahmad, the leader of the largest Islamic party in Pakistan, the Jamaat-e-Islami (JI), and of the six party religious alliance MMA, said that Nawaz had repeatedly met Osama bin Laden who offered him money to buy the loyalties of parlimentarians in the late 1980s in order to topple the government of then prime minister Benazir Bhutto. Ahmad also said that bin Laden was a big supporter of Nawaz Sharif's bid to be prime minister in 1990.[4]

5- Khawaja details regarding the meetings "I still remember that Osama bin Laden provided me with funds, which I handed over to Nawaz Sharif, then the chief minister of Punjab [and later premier], to dislodge Benazir Bhutto. Nawaz Sharif insisted that I arrange a direct meeting with the "Sheikh", which I did in Saudi Arabia. Nawaz met thrice with Osama in Saudi Arabia. " The most historic was the meeting in the Green Palace Hotel in Medina between Nawaz Sharif, Osama and myself, Khayyam Qaiser is the witness for that meeting in which Khayyem, the personal staff officer tried to take a photograph but Osama's friends there stopped him.[5]

6- The NPOV can be confirmed from additional neutral sources mentioned below:

http://www.militantislammonitor.org/article/id/1779 and http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=spring89gulbhutto#spring89gulbhutto and http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_23-6-2005_pg7_34 and http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=alate96osamaelection#alate96osamaelection

7- Hence I think its proper to include a sub-heading GeneralNeo (talk) 17:31, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Dear User:Sarmadhassan,

There are many referencing stories being published in newspapers around Pakistan and the issue being discussed in talk shows in Pakistan, do you live in Pakistan?

Check these stories out: http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2009\09\10\story_10-9-2009_pg7_23

Watch this video of 11th Hr program with Jasmin Manzoor. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AowG8GoUir4

I think User:GeneralNeo and myself have proved our point thus including the contents back. Thank you YawarSid (talk) 18:34, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Reversion

There have been a lot of edits made over the past week that are:

I know that these edits have been made with the beest of intentions, but editors must understand that that Wikipedia is not a soapbox. However paassionately you feel for or against Mr. Sharif, edits must be done in a neutral tone of voice and using materials that is referenced from reliable sources. You cannot just start adding things that you believe to be true. Ground Zero | t 18:24, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

I have taken a stab at removing poorly-written, unreference, biased material. This needs more work and to be watched closely. Ground Zero | t 18:52, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Revisions required by this article.

Hello,

This article does not fit into Wikipedia's writing standard for Biographies. I am hoping independent editors and editors relating to WikiProject Pakistan would revise this article to fit the standard of a properly written biography of a political leader. Please correct some of the problems that include but are not limited to:

  • Poorly referenced articles.
  • Numerous repetitions within and outside sections.
  • References to blog sites and editorial pages as opposed to genuine news sources.
  • Untitled references that make it difficult to identify the cited News Article.
  • Poorly used grammar in many sections of the article. (Ineligibility to Contest etc.)
  • Chronologically flawed pattern of writing, dates are mixed up. Needs to be written in order of the dates of particular events.
  • Sections such as 'Return to Pakistan in 2007 after forced exile' do not seem to be a section of a biography but a timeline that has scattered news events on it.
  • Poor pattern for titles. 'Chief minister of Panjab' sub-section comes within 'Political Life' section but excludes the 'Prime Minister' section although both sections include details regarding his tenure in political positions.
  • The picture showing Pakistan's first national highway is under the 'Return to Pakistan' section instead of the 'Prime Minister' Section, which is irrelevant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Umervakil (talk • contribs) 09:56, 27 August 2010 (UTC)


As a good start and to serve as an example, I have made a few edits to make this article seem more reliable:

  • Fixed chronological issues such as the position of the sub-section: 'Assassination of Benazir Bhutto'.
  • Removed the 'Resignation from Coalition Government' section as its content was a repetition of information mentioned in the 'Reinstatement of Judges section'.
  • Titled many untitled news references. Added the News source and the date the article was written on.
  • Removed some unauthentic news references including a reference to a page that provided no relevant information to the article.
  • Revised the 'Reinstatement of Judges' section as it was poorly worded and the grammar used in it was completely wrong. The content may remain objectionable.

I hope my contributions can start the cleaning-up of this page. Please try to add accurate references and contribute more to this article at the same time.

Umervakil (talk) 09:25, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Its WIKIPEIDA not a political blog

Please everyone when writing something about political stuff, plz remain neutral..Dont mention Punjabi, sindhi, etc HunterZone (talk) 11:24, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Wikipedia.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Wikipedia.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:48, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

File:N.sharif.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:N.sharif.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:06, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Dynamic Lion?

Could someone knowledgable please fact check the picture box that has his title as "Dynamic Lion?" Is this correct? 38.103.42.150 (talk) 20:22, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

File:17524 supporteres viollence2.gif Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:17524 supporteres viollence2.gif, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:25, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Zia ul haq.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Zia ul haq.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 3 November 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:15, 3 November 2011 (UTC)


Linking

WP:OVERLINK specificly says:

"Unless they are particularly relevant to the topic of the article, it is generally inappropriate to link:
  • plain English words;
  • terms whose meaning would be understood by almost all readers;
  • items that would be familiar to most readers, such as the names of major geographic features and locations, religions, languages, common professions and common units of measurement (particularly if a conversion is provided);
  • dates."

Ground Zero | t 22:17, 1 February 2012 (UTC)


Anti Establishment Stance

Dont revert this section, If you have disputes then discuss here, especially Smsarmad you dont own wikipedia, stop doing edit wars, a video is a reference too Yousufshakeel65 (talk) 14:26, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

The link you have added is not considered a reliable source by Wikipedia. Wikipedia is governed by some rules and having reliable source is one of them and I am just following them. You better take a look at them first. --SMS Talk 14:48, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Furthermore these video links are a clear violation of WP:LINKVIO. --SMS Talk 14:52, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

The link that was added as reference is copyright holder of the video in geographic territorial boundaries of Pakistan. Yousufshakeel65 (talk) 15:06, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Confusing grammar

"The may be it is true executive authorisation of Pakistan's nuclear testing programme was an important turning point in his political career that would bring his image into world prominence."

I'm not doubting the facts of this sentence, but the beginning of this sentence makes no sense. Since there have been some accusations of bad faith edits here, and disputes over accused point-of-view pushing (which I'm not interested in evaluating)-- and because I'm not at all sure what the beginning of this sentence is trying to say-- I thought I'd put it here for someone familiar with the topic to edit this sentence into something that makes more sense. Wabbott9 Tell me about it.... 00:42, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Edit request on 14 May 2013

JimjamMedia (talk) 15:09, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Note: No request made. If you're asking that you be allowed to edit the page, it was protected from editing due to frequent vandalism over the last few days, and will be unprotected in about a week. In the meantime, if you have any specific requests for changes to this article, feel free to make them. --ElHef (Meep?) 15:22, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Neutrality

Nawaz Sharif is a pure Kashmiri and not a Punjabi as the Jewish origin media is circulating. No similarity between thekashmiri and Punjabi. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.46.26.188 (talk) 13:16, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

If you would like a change made to this article, please be specific (in the form of "Change X to Y") as to the change you would like made. Please note that any changes made to the article must be accompanied by a reliable source before they can be added to the article. Thanks, --ElHef (Meep?) 13:24, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Scandals

all the scandals I have given are fact, there is no question of fale or alleged, its like watergate all the scandals listed are facts and no way to deny them --Multan47 (talk) 23:47, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Where is the Neutrality?

I cannot find the source stating that Nawaz Sharif is personally involved in those scandals. His party's members and his younger brother is linked, not his name. The scandal page should be merged with PML-N's page. The Taxation scandal proves his involvement in 1999, but I cannot find his name in the sources.

The term "No Wonder, People of other province....." are nothing but simply insulting his personality. I did research in his industrial program. Yes, the program was simple case of "industrial racism", but it should be written in more academic style, constructive criticism should be given to him. Personal bias, personal hatred, anger, and brutal grammar made this article hard to justify and difficult to approach. Also, in Nuclear tests sections, why is Pervez Muharraf's comments there?

Pervez Musharraf had no military or/ logistics role conducting the nuclear tests, he was not even taken confident in the program. It was general Karamat who was involved in all of the efforts. Musharraf, with all due paying respect, had no role in the atomic bomb programme until he became Chief of Army Staff in 1999. His comments are not factual and true to its nature. I strongly suggest removing Musharraf's comment on nuclear testings sections.

Dr. Abdul Qadeer Khan is also not trusting figure, on many occasions he provided wrong figures which were noted by Western journalists and his own peers. He does has problems with former prime minister, he had no role in the development of nuclear testings sites. He project himself of something he is not. Including senior officials and journalists later figured out that Khan's role was not deeply as big as he made it. In an article (source provided), it states that dr. Khan was not even invited to witness the tests by Sharif nor he acted as the prime minister's science adviser. Dr. Mubarakmand and dr. Ishfaq Ahmad were the ones leading and advising on nuclear physics issues; when Khan learned it, he was frustrated with the prime minister. Dr. Khan's knows that whole nation knows his dirty truth, that is why on many occasions (if he wouldn't miss) gave vehement criticism to the prime minister. I'm not Sharif's big fan, but true factual facts must be included. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.3.146.238 (talk) 02:27, 7 February 2012 (UTC) He is a very honest man. aspacielly for aoudiance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.185.145.117 (talk) 10:47, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Reader feedback: need more pics

39.53.219.165 posted this comment on November 20, 2012 (view all feedback).

Need more pics

Any thoughts?

Faizan 14:51, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

This article is too long

This article should be more concise I think but I am not the one who is in a position to do that. It seems to repeat information and is quite long.Anderson Rawls (talk) 16:06, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Facebook Page

Someone please verify and add this Facebook page to External Links. The page is well connected to the official pages, e.g. CM Punjab Shehbaz Sharif page etc. RedGerbera (talk) 02:17, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Not done: According to the page's protection level and your user rights, you should currently be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:21, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
I can edit but I cannot verify. So I wanted someone to confirm first. RedGerbera (talk) 04:50, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Nawaz Sharif is not known for his cricket. A link to his unknown cricket profile has been placed in external links. Nawaz Sharif on Facebook, PML(N) website and some other pages comtaining relevant information should be added to external links of this article. RedGerbera (talk) 22:38, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

The Facebook page you are trying to add is not verified, so we cannot confirm whether the page is controlled by the subject or some fan. And it is not the only one, there are dozens of them. -- SMS Talk 22:25, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

show laytest ecconomic

all information which is ralated lastest of education also show in artical . and also show demarits of ecconomic,oureducation system decile day by day what is think about it? THE main reson are teachers poor work.are you thought that why our govt teachers prefer privat education org. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.45.97.62 (talk) 12:12, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 18 February 2015

182.188.242.234 (talk) 19:15, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Not done: as you have not requested a change.
If you want to suggest a change, please request this in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 19:22, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Cricket career

As Sharif is a former first-class cricketer, a fact acknowledged by the page being in category:Pakistan Railways cricketers, it's surprising to me that there isn't a single mention of his short career in the article. Even if he was otherwise a complete unknown and had no other career, he would still meet cricket notability guidelines, but the word "cricket" doesn't even appear in the piece currently. —Strange Passerby (t × c) 16:42, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

He is not known for the single first class cricket match he played decades ago. I think this cricket career should be removed from this article and external links section except categories. The cricket profile link should only be used in references if and only if his cricket is mentioned in article. RedGerbera (talk) 22:50, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Yes he is not known as a cricketer but he is a former first class cricketer and has also played against West Indies while captaining Punjab Chief Minister's XI during the warm up matches of 1987 World Cup. There are numerous reliable sources covering his short cricketing career. -- SMS Talk 22:37, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

He has never been a cricketer.Did you know in the 2014 elections there were rumours that he bribed people to cheat. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greenycric (talk • contribs) 21:03, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Conglomerate

please change ((conglomerate)) to ((Conglomerate (company)|conglomerate)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.154.175.89 (talk • contribs)

Done Cannolis (talk) 14:54, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Nawaz Sharif. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:18, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 21 April 2016

Shobi136 (talk) 06:43, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Not done: as you have not requested a change.
If you want to suggest a change, please request this in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 10:43, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Bias

This page is written like a self promotion article. RAFiFan (talk) 09:30, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 14 June 2016

He is money lunderer and a coward prime minister who afraids of his people. Shahroz nawaz (talk) 06:16, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  06:17, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 27 July 2016

39.32.1.57 (talk) 06:38, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Not done: as you have not requested a change.
If you want to suggest a change, please request this in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 08:06, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Nawaz Sharif. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:14, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

he is a very chawal person.why he won't die. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.186.159.198 (talk) 15:38, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Neutrality

No such thing as Punjabi of Kashmiri origin. This term has its origin from the Jewish lobby for known reasons. Sharif and his wife are pure Kashmiris residing in the Punjab. Both Kashmiris and Punjabis are a distinct ethnic group.


Sharif is surely a pure Aryan Kashmiri. But his family is not of Brahmin (Bhat or Butt) background but of some other caste. This is true. His wife of is of pure Aryan Brahmin Kashmiri background. Granddaughter of mighty Gama Bhat. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.134.65.105 (talk) 23:24, 27 May 2017 (UTC)


All fake data on Sharif, he is not of the Kashmiri Butt clan but a Khar (Iron Smith). His wife Kulsoom is a genuine Butt (Muslim convert from Brahmins), we i the Valley out history.

The difference between the Kashmiris and Punjabis is like Apple and Organges. He is of the Khar (blacksmith caste) from the Kashmir Valley. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.134.243.21 (talk) 13:52, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Dr. Farooq Buch — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.134.243.21 (talk) 14:32, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you sir, we are enlightened! Did they arrest you yet or not? If not, remember a Sheriff is soon knocking on your door! Fake doctors are getting arrested all over Pakistan! "Clinics sealed: Five quacks arrested in crackdown" http://tribune.com.pk/story/944725/clinics-sealed-five-quacks-arrested-in-crackdown/ Sheriff (talk) 15:51, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Users like Mutlan 47, seems to have big problems and keep publishing stuff whatever comes up to his mind. False claims and ridiculous comments he/she is keep publishing on his page. He/she also brutalized and copy-pasted pages of Benazir, Zulfikar Bhutto and Sharif; he seems to have been a worker of Peoples Party where he/she foolishly writing the statements just to see the world what he thinks. Seriously, User:Multan 47 needs to out of this and I am sorry if you have problem with Nawaz Sharif but do not put weird and poor-grammar contained sentences on wikipedia.

A KASHMIRI MADE A PUNJABI BY FALSE PROPAGANDA BY THE U>S> JEWISH MEDIA> — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.46.26.188 (talk) 04:06, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

I will say, stop fighting about clans and give importance to human beings! Who cares what is Nawaz Sharif's clan, he is prime minister of Pakistan and that fact does not change whether you call him an iron smith or Butt or Kashmiri or Punjabi! Sheriff (talk) 15:37, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Sharif - Any word on who he will put up as the new PM?

I can't find it anything anywhere on that. Casprings (talk) 14:35, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

@Casprings: His brother: https://www.geo.tv/latest/151438-shehbaz-sharif-to-be-next-prime-minister sikander (talk) 14:37, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
And he already has a decent article. Back to American politics! Casprings (talk) 14:39, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
No. His brother is not member of the lower house therefore he cannot become the Prime Minister until he elect to the lower house. He will most probably elect within next 60 days and sworn in as the Prime Minister but before all that, there will be intern prime minister but the name has not been decided yet. --Saqib (talk) 14:42, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
I am adding Khawaja Asif as the succeeding prime minister per this. concerns can be addressed here. --Saqib (talk) 16:11, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 29 July 2017

Nawaz Sharif has been disqualified on grounds of misrepresentation of assets in the nomination papers at ECP in 2013 but for a period not yet specified by the court. This is yet to be determined. 103.255.5.104 (talk) 13:59, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Marianna251TALK 14:56, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

is 'Colorism' common in Pakistan?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discrimination_based_on_skin_color CorvetteZ51 (talk) 09:59, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Not sure why you feel this is relevant to the article. Which reliable sources mention it with regard to Sharif? MPS1992 (talk) 12:04, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Omogbai Elvis Aidelojie

Omogbai Elvis Aidelojoe (talk) 11:08, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Not done: as you have not requested a change.
Please request your change in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 11:22, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 2 August 2017

Please add |net_worth = {{decrease}} {{PKRConvert|1.75|b}} in the personal information of the infobox. It will appear as DecreaseRs. 1.75 billion (US$6.1 million)

Source is from Dawn. It is also written in the Wealth and conglomerates section of the article.

Also use{{PKRConvert}} template for net worth numbers everywhere in the Wealth and conglomerates section. I'm writing the numbers with the template just copy and paste it. Change Rs1.4 billion to {{PKRConvert|147.5|b}}, Rs166 million to {{PKRConvert|166|m}}, Rs1.82 billion to {{PKRConvert|1.82|b}}, Rs 12.4 million to {{PKRConvert|12.4|m}} and finally the latest Rs 1.75 biliion to {{PKRConvert|1.75|b}}. .--119.160.100.70 (talk) 00:58, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Done jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 22:41, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Please remove subject of the Image.

Please Remove his picture subject he is no more Prime Minister of Pakistan.

Regards, Amir Khan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amir Khan 123 (talk • contribs) 19:02, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Not done: The infobox states that he was (past tense) PM and that his term ended 28 July 2017. Had he still been in office, it would have said "incumbent". Favonian (talk) 19:08, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 11 August 2017

Please change the begining line to this:

Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif (Urdu/Punjabi: میاں محمد نواز شریف, born 25 December 1949) is a Pakistani businessman and politician who served as the Prime Minister of Pakistan from 2013 until disqualification for life by Supreme Court of Pakistan, in 2017. He had previously served as the Prime Minister twice from 1990 to 1993 and 1997 to 1999 and also the Chief Minister of Punjab from 1985 to 1990. He is Pakistan's longest-serving prime minister.[6]

This is more accurate.--139.190.118.184 (talk) 05:06, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ http://www.pakistanihistory.com/92.htm
  2. ^ http://politicalinquirer.com/2007/12/31/ronald-reagan-meeting-with-talibanal-qaedamujahideen/
  3. ^ http://www.nysun.com/foreign/sharif-maneuvers-for-power-in-pakistan/84638/
  4. ^ http://www.militantislammonitor.org/article/id/1779
  5. ^ http://www.militantislammonitor.org/article/id/1779
  6. ^ "Pakistan's prime minister is pushed out by the Supreme Court". The Economist. 29 July 2017. Retrieved 1 August 2017.
Not done: The Panama Papers case is explained later in the lead. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 05:25, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
I notice the change. The way the paragraph is written now still works for the regular editors. There is no reason to change this. Not done. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 07:42, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 25 August 2017

1. in order for the NAB to continue investigation corruption charges 

   please change 'investigation corruption' to 'investigation for corruption' because investigation is an action.

2. His deteriorating health and ultimately an open heart surgery 

   please change complete line to 'His deteriorating health had him undergo an open heart surgery' to make it meaningful.

3 Sharif attempted to reverse of Bhutto's nationalisation policies 

   please change 'to reverse of' to 'to reverse' because there is no need of preposition.

4 had a better standard of living compared to other provinces. 

   please change 'other provinces' to "other provinces' standard" because of the comparison.

5 that not only benefited and also the people of Punjab province. 

   please change 'benefited and also' to 'benefited the army/him but also' because of missing noun.

6 and the Army Special Service Group and the Naval Special Service Group was rushed 

   Please change ‘was rushed’ to ‘were rushed’ because of two groups.

7 The clash between liberalism and conservatism soon forces soon erupted 

   Please change ‘soon forces soon erupted’ to ‘soon erupted forces’ because of a typo.

8 brought an economic halt in the country that dismantle Sharif's industrialization 

   Please change ‘that dismantle’ to ‘that dismantled’ because of the past.

9 projects to stimulate the economy, such as the Ghazie-Barotah Hydropower plant and the. 

   Please add any project name.

10 Few of the loans were repaid by the government and Sharif founded it difficult to privatised 

   Please change ‘founded it difficult to privatised’ to ‘found it difficult to privatise’ because of typos.

11 This radical move did had positive impact on country's economy 

   Please change ‘did had’ to ‘had a’ because of a typo.

12 His critics questions the lay out 

   Please change ‘questions’ to ‘questioned’ because of past.

13 Sharif's industrialisation are also target by his opponents 

   Please change ‘are also target’ to ‘was also targeted’ because of typos.

14 Sharif is also blamed for expanding and finance Armed Forces' secretive industrial conglomerate and, is also blamed for bribing the generals to 

   protected himself.
   Please change ‘is’ to ‘was’.
   Please change ‘protected’ to ‘protect’.

15 The Peoples Party felt the privatisation policies where illegal and taking place 

   Please change ‘where’ to ‘were’ and ‘and taking’ to ‘,and were taking place’.

16 the economy in a turmoil that damaged Sharif's credibility. 

   Please change ‘economy in’ to ‘economy was in’.

17 no other leader has enjoyed the his level of extreme popularity. 

   Please change ‘the his’ to ‘this’.

Kindly review and edit the complete article. Arslan4886 (talk) 15:35, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Partly done: Some notes: On #2, instead of 'had him' I used 'forced him to' because it made more sense. On #5, instead of 'the army/him' I used 'the army and himself' because the way you wrote it would seem like it benefited one or the other. On #9, I just removed 'and the'. On #15, if you see my diff of the changes, you will note another change made; please review it carefully. Everything else was changed as requested. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 15:53, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Nawaz Sharif. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:28, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Nawaz Sharif. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:26, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 27 December 2017

Please add and amend this information. "Nawaz Sharif is not current prime minister of Pakistan, he was disqualified and removed as Prime Minister of Pakistan on corruption charges by Supreme Court of Pakistan". Amanapart321 (talk) 10:26, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Note: The article is already updated with this information. -- HindWikiConnect 03:59, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nawaz Sharif. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:57, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 6 July 2018

He has been sentenced 10 years in Jail for the corruption. SO he is a corrupt Politician please mark his name as corrupt.

Nawaz Sharif sentenced to 10 years, Maryam 7 in Avenfield reference Ref https://www.geo.tv/latest/201862-nawaz-sharif-sentenced-to-10-years-maryam-7-in-avenfield-reference

ISLAMABAD: Former prime minister Nawaz Sharif was sentenced to 10 years in prison and slapped a £8 million fine in the Avenfield properties reference on Friday while his daughter Maryam was sentenced to seven years with a £2 million fine. 124.29.208.219 (talk) 12:52, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: We do not write "<name> is a corrupt politician". Writing this would be unencyclopedic. We write "<name> is a politician. In <date>, he was sentenced to <sentence>". L293D (☎ • ✎) 13:02, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 6 July 2018

sentenced 10 years to Jail in Pakistan. Charged for corruption and fined 10 Million pounds .— Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.247.48.158 (talk • contribs)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. L293D (☎ • ✎) 23:42, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

2nd Paragraph of article opening

Sharif was born into the "wealthy" or the "Upper-Middle" Class Sharif family. You can't be both. You are either wealthy or Upper-Middle Class. They are not the same thing. Which strata was Sharif born into? I personally have no idea. Stevenmitchell (talk) 15:02, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Reworded. Generally they're wealthy and the family has article. So no need to go into defining largely inexplicable social strata which doesn't have universal meaning. –Ammarpad (talk) 15:42, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Nawaz Sharif Arrested.

Muhammad Nawaz Sharif was former Prime Minister of Pakistan who is now arrested by NAB Pakistan Under Chargers of Corruption. He is been Fined for 800 thousand pounds by High Court Pakistan.

Kindly add this information with Muhammad Nawaz Sharif.

for verification: https://www.geo.tv/latest/203132-nawaz-sharif-maryam-nawaz-arrested 39.43.77.161 (talk) 06:57, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

 Already done --Danski454 (talk) 10:30, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Then where is it?2601:447:4101:41F9:C0A6:EF53:8346:F11D (talk) 14:56, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

@2601:447:4101:41F9:C0A6:EF53:8346:F11D: on the lead last paragraph Jibran1998 (talk) 15:56, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

There are many biased factors.

We all know Pakistan is a military oppressed country and when it comes to there supremacy then there is no law there is no order. We got freedom from British Colonialism but fell in economic slavery of our own men. Hassanmeraj13 (talk) 02:13, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 25 July 2018

Arsalan is the head of this party since day one 2A02:C7F:9266:3C00:698B:D013:8EE4:6261 (talk) 21:45, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Danski454 (talk) 22:04, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 10 August 2018

Category:Pakistani politicians convicted of crimes 194.176.105.138 (talk) 12:41, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Dolotta (talk) 14:28, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 5 October 2018

Please add to personal life that "Nawaz Sharif's wife, Kulsoom Nawaz, was diagnosed with lymphoma in August 2017 and died on 11TH September 2018, after suffering a cardiac arrest, when both Nawaz Sharif and Maryam Nawaz were serving jail terms." SOURCE: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kulsoom_Nawaz Khushbakhta (talk) 11:35, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made.  Spintendo  15:39, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

A new term is being coined by some foreigners (for their future agenda) mentioning Punjabi of Kashmiri origin. There is no link between the Punjabi and Kashmiri these are two distinct people. Moreover, to refer to a Kashmiri as a Punjabi is more often an abuse. Nawaz is from a Khaar (Lohar) family of Kashmir Valley while his wife was from the Brahmin Bhat (Butt) clan of Kashmiris.

Semi-protected edit request on 24 December 2018

He is now convicted of corruption and is in the jail under different charges and has been fined by the court of Pakistan Fahadikr (talk) 15:43, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 15:59, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 6 April 2019

Put that how did he earn the wealth, as we know he did a lot of corruption and he stole a lot of money from the treasure of Pakistan Government Umushtaq365 (talk) 12:11, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. – Þjarkur (talk) 13:15, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 15 August 2021

References #11 & #14 Google Book Link is broken (404). Change google book url link from https://books.google.com/books?id=fEZt49MVZIAC&pg=PA244 to https://books.google.com/books?id=0hUBAwAAQBAJ

Explanation: The IBSN number is for the Hardcover Print edition of the the book. There are several editions of the book available on google books: https://books.google.com/books?id=CtJEswEACAAJ&dq=pakistan:+a+hard+country&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiAvtiHw7PyAhXRWc0KHf5NBRUQ6AEwAHoECAkQAg The edition that appears to best match current reference is: https://books.google.com/books?id=0hUBAwAAQBAJ The publisher is PublicAffairs and the page references appear to be correct (11. p. 244 & 14. p. 275) ARubyRubes (talk) 17:53, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

 Done @ARubyRubes: BTW, the preferred complete syntax would be something like:
{{cite book |last=Lieven |first=Anatol |author-link=Anatol Lieven |title=Pakistan: A Hard Country |edition=1st |publisher=PublicAffairs |publication-place=New York |year=2011 |isbn=9781610390217 |oclc=787850771 |url={{Google books |id=0hUBAwAAQBAJ |plainurl=yes |page=PA244}} |page=244}}
Peaceray (talk) 20:00, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Pakistani cricketers

Why this page is in category Pakistani cricketers. signed, Iflaq (talk) 08:30, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Sugar mills case

He takes more than 50 millions dollars from america — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.7.79.105 (talk) 08:06, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 2 August 2022

Network is 0.6 billion Ptishifa (talk) 18:31, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:44, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 30 October 2022

2A04:4A43:553F:BA73:7C6B:1F0C:AD45:A51C (talk) 19:21, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Professional chor

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Danski454 (talk) 19:54, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 6 November 2022

Request to undo the recent revision of User:M.Ashraf333. Cited info was removed from intro without adequate explanation. Wikipedia:Let the facts speak for themselves Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a fan website Cactihasbik (talk) 11:44, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Its not fan page as you wrote and your wish can not fulfil as what you required. I explained my edit and and if you need to add something else constructive on this page please make section and add it because Intro isn't a section for the edit what you are looking for. The section Panama Papers explains each and every thing. Thanks M.Ashraf333 (talk) 12:39, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Jumped case

Around the elections of Pakistan in jumped by a gang of teenage boys 78.148.123.205 (talk) 23:18, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Citation correction

The page cites "wealthiest men in Pakistan" where claiming that he is one of the wealthiest in Pakistan. The referred page doesn't cite him back. Since the page is edit protected, how do I correct it? umar 23:35, 10 April 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Umar.techboy (talk • contribs)

Bakora singh

Nawaz sharif is one of most prominent leaders of pak he is looking like sheep and he kicked out pakistani people he is the crypt men 2407:D000:503:1C51:C144:F394:4719:4AC2 (talk) 03:56, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 10 June 2023 (Adding "Book" section)

Hi I want to add a "Book" section.

In terms of section placement it should feature after "2016 Panama Papers leak" and before "2016 Panama Papers leak".

It should look like that.

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit semi-protected}} template. - FlightTime (open channel) 15:02, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi I didn't because I found this particularly uncontroversial. Thanks. 2A02:A03F:6504:1700:E06E:AA27:8AE2:83EC (talk) 17:16, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
I'm reiterating my request as I find puzzling the fact that this change isn't brought. I read the following on the page :
"Consensus isn't needed if a change is not controversial."
So I don't know what really is controversial about the books of an author especially considered that it's sourced ?
Please reconsider your decision.
Thanks. 2A02:A03F:6504:1700:D13D:96EE:94D4:6479 (talk) 18:57, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Books

Nawaz has published the following books:[1]

  • Model Town Ka Beta [The Son of Model Town], Model Town Publications, 2000, 298 p. Autobiography
  • Ghaddar Kaun? Nawaz Sharif Ki Kahani Un Ki Zabani [The Traitor Within: The Nawaz Sharif Story In His Own Words], Sagar Publications, 2006, 456 p.
 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit semi-protected}} template. DreamRimmer (talk) 18:36, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ Profile on Open Library
Hi, I'm copypasting the message written above :
"I'm reiterating my request as I find puzzling the fact that this change isn't brought. I read the following on the page :
"Consensus isn't needed if a change is not controversial."
So I don't know what really is controversial about the books of an author especially considered that it's sourced ?
Please reconsider your decision." Thanks
2A02:A03F:6504:1700:F4F4:4D67:99D3:38DD (talk) 11:38, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
I'm also a little confused. FlightTime and DreamRimmer, would you mind explaining why this addition might be controversial? Tollens (talk) 04:29, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi @Tollens: It appears preferable to seek consensus before adding these books because {{Controversial}} template is already on top of this talk page and because the titles of these books suggest that this is the best course of action. From the second book's title, it appears that Nawaz Sharif and other prominent figures may be the subject of accusations and denials. 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 05:10, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Great - thanks for the explanation, that makes sense and I'd tend to agree. I've closed the request again. Tollens (talk) 05:21, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Per DreamRimmer - FlightTime (open channel) 15:45, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
OK I get the point and I think it's fair enough, but could we at least put the "non controversial" (non political) books ? Like the following
Thanks!
=== Books ===
Among other books, Nawaz has published the following:[1]
  • Model Town Ka Beta [The Son of Model Town], Model Town Publications, 2000, 298 p. Autobiography
2A02:A03F:6504:1700:F537:BE98:7D89:BAF4 (talk) 14:17, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ Profile on Open Library
 Done
I don't see anything particularly controversial about listing the books he's published without comment. However, in case others disagree, courtesy ping @FlightTime, @DreamRimmer, @Tollens
Xan747 (talk) 19:48, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Fine by me - certainly without any information about the books being in the article, I don't see why not. Tollens (talk) 22:42, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 28 October 2023

The name is "Ishtiari Nawaz Shreef" as ordered by the Supreme Court of Pakistan. Tahacheemakhan (talk) 05:54, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 09:54, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 10 February 2024

103.94.255.194 (talk) 09:51, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. --AntiDionysius (talk) 09:53, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Nawaz_Sharif/Archive_1&oldid=1256523797"