Jump to content

Talk:NASA

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleNASA was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day...Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 8, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
June 9, 2007Good article nomineeListed
July 28, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
June 15, 2020Good article reassessmentDelisted
June 8, 2024Good article reassessmentNot listed
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on October 1, 2004, October 1, 2005, October 1, 2006, July 29, 2008, July 29, 2009, July 29, 2010, July 29, 2013, July 29, 2016, and July 29, 2018.
Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive This article was on the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive for the week of October 2, 2005.
Current status: Delisted good article

typo of the word apollo

[edit]

in the moon landing section, at paragraph 5, line 4, the word apollo is spelled appollo. could somebody fix that quick Andpug1 (talk) 12:56, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. YBSOne (talk) 16:38, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Work on bringing to Good Article

[edit]

Hello all! I will be starting work to bring this article to a good article status over the next couple of weeks. Any suggestions, comments, concerns welcome below! Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 21:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The final two paragraphs of the "Moon landing" subsection don't really seem to belong there. The second paragraph should also be reworded and expanded. Ships & Space(Edits) 21:28, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ships&Space, thanks for the thoughts! Do you think the last two paragraphs be kept in the NASA article to another section or deleted altogether? Will work on re-wording/expanding second paragraph. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 23:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edits For Review

[edit]

Hello there,

I posted some edits to the NASA Research Park talk page and would appreciate if someone could take a look. Thank you.

2601:646:100:E880:CED:6845:1D02:6D48 (talk) 17:59, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

floating railway on the moon

[edit]

@Cocobb8, @SpaceHist65, @SpaceHist65,

I’m new to this article. Wanted to float this by some experienced contributors to this article. I saw this interesting tidbit about a floating railway to the moon NASA might do. Would we want to add this? (https://www.autoblog.com/2024/05/21/nasa-wants-to-build-a-floating-railway-on-the-moon/) Thanks! Hannahthom7 (talk) 14:25, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is quite a bit of news coverage, I would say yes but it should be limited to a single sentence at least on this page. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 14:30, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]