Talk:N3V Games

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Outdated Sources

What is the procedure for citations that no longer work? I found one that is now behind a paydoor. Otherwise they are no longer available. Eric Patterson (talk) 03:03, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Differentiating between companies in the Auran Group

From what I understand there's several companies named Auran, which have the following roles:

Auran Games manages the games once released.
Auran Developments develops the games.
Auran Publishing publishes games.
Auran Holdings owns the group's trademarks.
Auran Technologies... not sure.
All 5 are proprietary limited companies (Pty) in Queensland, postal code 4005.

Since I'm not 100% sure, could anyone please clarify the situation and/or expand/update the article accordingly?

Resources:

http://abr.business.gov.au/ , search for "auran"

--85.5.167.153 (talk) 04:31, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"contributed to"?

How come Fury is listed as only being "contributed to by Auran", and not "developed by Auran". AFAIK Auran designed and developed the game entirely themselves (except for licensed technology of course, such as the Unreal Engine). 203.2.182.254 (talk) 00:30, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think the more accurate term is vaporware. Auran never fully developed Fury even though it released it. 12.206.60.33 (talk) 00:33, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Posted to User talk:Michael Bednarek

People, you don't revert a careful edit of 5,706 characters with multiple cites and call yourself responsible. This article is about N3V, but N3V and Trainz are closely intertwined and entangled. This Michael Bednarek needs to take time to fix things not cut them wholesale.

How do you call your self an editor ... when at your apparent best... you cut out 5,000 plus characters ON TOPIC. Material it took hours put together. Section was about N3V history, which updated the article to the last six years, not left it in the last decade. You should really feel proud, if you were 14.

Kindly take the time TO EDIT, not revert or don't come to Wikipedia. THis is butchery and laziness. You don't like the tone, fix it. No problem. But N3V and Trainz are intertwined, PERIOD. N3V's other projects were things your cavalier edit also cut out. BE AN EDITOR, NOT A PROBLEM.

This was slapdash and irresponsible. I wouldn't hire this guy for anything. // FrankB 02:53, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on N3V Games. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091029100008/http://palgn.com.au/9823/auran-development-team-in-liquidation/ to http://palgn.com.au/9823/auran-development-team-in-liquidation/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:50, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Rail Sim Pro" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Rail Sim Pro has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25 § Rail Sim Pro until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 00:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]