Talk:Music library

Libraries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical music

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Record Production Top‑importance

	Record production portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Production; a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's documentation of Record Production articles. Questions or comments related to record production and related articles are welcome at the project's talk page. Anyone interested may join the project: add your name to the list of project members!Record ProductionWikipedia:WikiProject Record ProductionTemplate:WikiProject Record ProductionRecord Production articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Professional sound production Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sound recording and reproduction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Professional sound productionWikipedia:WikiProject Professional sound productionTemplate:WikiProject Professional sound productionProfessional sound production articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I notice that link http://www.songwriting-guide.com/music-library.html is being flagged with a warning message. Can anyone inform the webmaster or should a replacement link be found? Writie (talk) 16:58, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

The links section is great, but it could use a bit of reorganization and here is why:

"Classical Music Library" (Classical.com) is merely a (commericial) streaming music library that also allows limited free downloads and/or pay-per for extra downloads past the limit. This is, in short, a music library for those who merely wish to listen to the (in this case classical, though they also have some "world", jazz and blues) music; whereas sites such as "Media Music Now" are royalty-free music sites that sell music meant for using in "websites", "TV & radio", "podcasts" and so on (as opposed to offering it for listening pleasure), and have no streaming music. These really should be organized into two seperate subsections in the links, as this could prove frustrating and confusing to some users.

Coincidentally, I haven't been through all of the list yet (and do not probably have the time for it, either, at the moment), but both Classical.com and Media Music Now are based in the UK (Classical.com actually states this, and Media Music Now's prices are all in British currency, which, being used only in the U.K., kind of proves quite strongly that it's based there). I've only checked those two links out yet, but is there a slight UK bias here, or is it just my weird sort of luck to have chosen not only two commercial sites out of the list but two commercial sites based in the UK?

Also, given the added importance of the difference between commercial (e.g. for-profit sites that charge money) and non-commercial sites, why on Earth are they mixed in the links? I may later go back and fix some of this, but I would be very happy if someone else would get the ball rolling. ^_^ Runa27 22:03, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind - did it myself anyway. :P Also, actually labeled the External Links section as such and added details. Almost all the sites are US-based, UK-based or German-based, but there's also at least one from the Middle East and several I couldn't find a location for, so I guess there isn't any particular bias; I just clicked a pair of links that happened to be based in the same country.

Sidenote: awful lot of commercial sites here (especially for royalty-free music... jeez, isn't there simply a links archive or two for this or something somewhere that we could link to? Might be easier, and nicer, and seem less spammish, though I do think the links should be available to illustrate the various forms of royalty-free music, plus, they're useful links anyway, but still - THAT many? Too much!), are there any more (legal) non-commercial sites we could link? Anybody know? For example, public domain music sites would be great - legal, and I'm sure there's a few with free content. Runa27 23:03, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notable UK production music libraries

I removing this section. It appears to be a spam magnet. LarryQ (talk) 14:50, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Musical instrument library

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Music library. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:53, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]