Talk:Monster Hunter Dynamic Hunting

Apps Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of apps on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AppsWikipedia:WikiProject AppsTemplate:WikiProject Appsapps articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Contribute to the project:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Good article nominations : Improve Application software, Facebook and Instagram to good article status
Stubs : Category:Mobile game stubs, Category:Stub-Class apps articles

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (6 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (2 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

merge with the main Monster Hunter Article

For an article this long its a better idea to merge it with the main Monster Hunter Article Wikishagnik (talk) 17:07, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The current length of an article is not a good indicator in determining whether a subject should exist as a stand-alone article. This article is currently a stub. According to documentation regarding merging of stub articles, "if a small article has little properly sourced information, or if its subject has no inherent notability, it may be deleted or be merged into another relevant article." Since this article does have properly sourced information, and has an inherent notability, it would not be appropriate to merge this article. However, since I do not believe that the subject matter is fully discussed, and believe it should be fleshed out, I will place a stub template on the bottom to urge people to expand it. I will also note that I plan to expand the article myself when I get some time. Thanks for your concern. Brian Reading (talk) 00:23, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]