Talk:MegaWars III

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (6 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (2 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Untitled

I put this in various "Video Game" categories because I could not find any corresponding *non*-video Game categories. Monty669 (talk) 14:39, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect

[1] @Maury Markowitz, the article was entirely sourced to your personal blog, which is not a reliable source. Please remove the content that cannot be sourced to publications with editorial pedigree. If there isn't enough content to sustain a separate article, make a section in Kesmai to incubate the information summary style. There is no need for AfD when redirection/merger is a suitable alternative. czar 17:05, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It took me longer to find RS than it did for you to redir, so why didn't you just do that and save everyone the trouble? And why not ask first? Maury Markowitz (talk) 20:37, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I did a good faith search and didn't find enough to sustain an article (there still isn't, honestly). And you know, "The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material." The majority of this content is primary source original research better suited for a topic-specific wiki than a general encyclopedia. Once the primary source accounts are analyzed and published in a reliable, secondary source, we would have better cause for repeating the claims, leaning on the reputation of the publication. czar 20:46, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]