Talk:Marvel vs. Capcom Origins

Marvel vs. Capcom Origins has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Marvel vs. Capcom Origins is part of the Marvel vs. Capcom series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 4, 2016	Good article nominee	Listed
May 31, 2017	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (6 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (2 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Marvel vs. Capcom Origins/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 20:43, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think I'll finish this tomorrow. JAGUAR 20:43, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the wait, I'll definitely finish this tomorrow. JAGUAR 23:02, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comments

~~Once again, I'd recommend unlinking video game in the lead due to potential overlinkage~~

"The dual pack was released through the PlayStation Network and Xbox Live Arcade in September and October 2012." - The dual pack was released through the PlayStation Network and Xbox Live Arcade in September and October 2012, respectively.

"Origins was released to mixed and positive reviews" - how about The game was met with mixed to positive reviews upon release?

"but criticized it for its clunky, outdated gameplay and unbalanced rosters" - I'd remove 'clunky', makes it sound a bit choppy here

I would recommend splitting the Gameplay section into two paragraphs, to improve prose flow

"which had also included online play using GGPO" - unlink GGPO here, it is already linked in gameplay

~~Once more, I think it would be best to split the reception section into two paragraphs, with a new one starting at "Taylor Cocke of IGN rated the title 8.2/10..."~~
No dead refs, and they all meet WP:VG/RS

Nice work on this article, overall it's well written and comprehensive for an online-only game. Sorry for the delay too, I usually review GANs within 24 hours. Once all of the minor issues are out of the way then this can pass. JAGUAR 16:06, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thank you once again for your time! Wani (talk) 17:42, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]