Jump to content

Talk:Mamoru Samuragochi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Information needs verification

[edit]

Look at this.--Patafisik (talk) 12:06, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Could you be more specific? What information needs verification? The CNN article you linked to above is already used as a reference source within the article, so could you please elaborate? --DAJF (talk) 12:38, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not a controversy

[edit]

Avoid using the word "controversy" as there isn't. People use that word interchangeably with "scandal", which is not correct. There's no debate over the core issue as Samuragochi does not dispute that Takashi Niigaki wrote much of is work. --Harizotoh9 (talk) 07:54, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mamoru Samuragochi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:14, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is it correct to call him a composer?

[edit]

If someone else created the work he has been credited for is it correct to refer to him as a composer? John Cummings (talk) 10:19, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

John Cummings, I don't believe everything he was credited for was ghostwritten. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 18:41, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]