Talk:MX vs. ATV Unleashed

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Gilman Louie (1 participant)
Yoshimitsu (1 participant)
Dr. Wily (2 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (2 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (4 participants)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (6 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (7 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Clear consensus to merge. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 02:48, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The current content of MX vs. ATV: On the Edge does not substantiate the notability of the topic apart from this game, and defines it as a near-direct port of this game under a different title. The content should be merged into this article. Rman41 (talk) 07:12, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support The PSP article says it's a "straightforward port", these are the sorts of games where you lose nothing if they are merged and the reception combined together. While I disagree it "does not substantiate notability", there is too much of an overlap. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:51, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- I specifically mean its notability separate from this topic. Rman41 (talk) 08:28, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support If the article is to be taken on face value that it's a port with minor graphical differences and omissions, it could be easily addressed under the lead article. Neither article is detailed enough to warrant the split. That said, it would be good to confirm this is the case, as the text is unsourced. Vrxces (talk) 09:51, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Not a notable example of a port. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 22:07, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.