Talk:Lunt Roman Fort

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lunt Roman Fort article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Warwickshire

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Warwickshire, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Warwickshire. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.WarwickshireWikipedia:WikiProject WarwickshireTemplate:WikiProject WarwickshireWikiProject Warwickshire articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Fortifications / British / European / Roman & Byzantine / Classical

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Roman and Byzantine military history task force
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)

Archaeology Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Herbert Art Gallery and Museum Start‑class High‑importance

	This article is related to the Herbert Art Gallery and Museum. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.Herbert Art Gallery and MuseumWikipedia:GLAM/HAGAMTemplate:WikiProject Herbert Art Gallery and MuseumHerbert Art Gallery and Museum-related articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Boudica#Location of her defeat|final campaign against]] The anchor (#Location of her defeat) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Lunt Roman Fort

Hi, I am a guide at Lunt Roman Fort and would like to thank everybody who has contributed to this article. In the coming week the team at the Fort are going to edit this article too add depth, change the status of the article from a stub and add a number of photographs that we have that we feel highlight the unique nature of the site.

We do not intend to upset anyone by editing the article and welcome any input. Kind regards Lunt Roman Fort

(Lunt.Roman.Fort (talk) 10:58, 29 May 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Your input is certainly welcome here so long as your edits keep a neutral point of view and do not become self promotion. Also, here is a reference to guide your addition of photographs. One more thing: You'll need to have individual user names as accounts cannot be used by groups of people. I have left a message on your talk page with more detail. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 12:29, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Uncle Mitty

Thankyou for your quick feedback. First yes I am sure that our edits will not be self promotion or anything other than academic and second yes I realise that the guides need individual accounts. I will change the account name as suggested.

(Lunt.Roman.Fort (talk) 12:44, 29 May 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Take a look at similar articles that will give you some ideas for structure and what is required to improve the article. Warwick Castle is a featured article and may be a useful article to base this one on. Happy editing. Keith D (talk) 00:33, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

English Heritage and National Trust sites often have guidebooks which are excellent sources for expanding Wikipedia articles. Does Lunt have anything similar? Nev1 (talk) 23:47, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

While Keith D suggests Warwick Castle as a reference point for how this article may develop, there is a handful of well-developed articles specifically on Roman forts, although they are all further away than Warwick. Deva Victrix (a very large fortress which became Chester), Mamucium (a fort for around 500 soldiers, the site of which later became Manchester), and Castleshaw Roman fort (a fort for around 500 soldiers later replaced by a fortlet for around 100; it never became a fully-fledged settlement). Nev1 (talk) 23:57, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Lunt" etymology

When I asked a guide at the fort some years ago I was told that the word lunt described a landscape feature. If I remember correctly, it had something to do with the steep drop towards the river. I don't know if the average Britisher would know this word, but I would expect most people who read the English Wikipedia from all over the world don't. So if anyone knows more about this, it would be a good idea to add to the article, I think. --BjKa (talk) 20:20, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lunt Roman Fort. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041022142327/http://www.roman-britain.org/places/the_lunt.htm to http://www.roman-britain.org/places/the_lunt.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:37, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]